The global landscape of online dementia resources

Abstract This multi-country study systematically assessed 124 publicly accessible online dementia resources across 17 countries. Using an evidence-based taxonomy, the study assessed alignment with carer needs regarding disease knowledge, healthcare navigation, financial/legal support, and self-care. Findings reveal disparities in availability and quality, with limited internet infrastructure creates a barrier to online support in lower-connectivity settings. NGO-led provision dominated (68%), though quality varied (mean domain coverage: 47-96%). Financial and legal information was notably underrepresented, potentially reflecting localized regulatory complexity and a “clinical-first” development focus. Higher-scoring resources were associated with clearer governance and dedicated funding. Technical accessibility (WCAG 2.1 Level AA) was variable. The study identified adaptable delivery models, including digital integration and cultural adaptation. This research establishes a baseline for monitoring equity and offers policy recommendations for minimum standards, health-system integration, and hybrid delivery to support equitable access to dementia information and support globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Dementia
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44400-026-00063-1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The global landscape of online dementia resources

Emmanuel Epenge, Rachel Milte, Khyati Tripathi, Charlèss Dupont et al.
npj Dementia
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

The global landscape of online dementia resources

Emmanuel Epenge, Rachel Milte, Khyati Tripathi, Charlèss Dupont, Inbal Mayan, Aline Nogueira Haas, Emily Adrion, Petya Grigorova, Iracema Leroi, Tomás León, Yaohua Chen, Irina Kinchin, Wambūi Karanja, Eliza Georgiou, Arianna Almirall Sanchez
article en

Abstract

Abstract This multi-country study systematically assessed 124 publicly accessible online dementia resources across 17 countries. Using an evidence-based taxonomy, the study assessed alignment with carer needs regarding disease knowledge, healthcare navigation, financial/legal support, and self-care. Findings reveal disparities in availability and quality, with limited internet infrastructure creates a barrier to online support in lower-connectivity settings. NGO-led provision dominated (68%), though quality varied (mean domain coverage: 47-96%). Financial and legal information was notably underrepresented, potentially reflecting localized regulatory complexity and a “clinical-first” development focus. Higher-scoring resources were associated with clearer governance and dedicated funding. Technical accessibility (WCAG 2.1 Level AA) was variable. The study identified adaptable delivery models, including digital integration and cultural adaptation. This research establishes a baseline for monitoring equity and offers policy recommendations for minimum standards, health-system integration, and hybrid delivery to support equitable access to dementia information and support globally.

npj DementiaVol. 2(1)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Flinders University (AU), University of Patras (GR), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Université de Lille (FR), Hospital del Salvador (CL), Université Protestante au Congo (CD), Futures Group (United States) (US), Aga Khan University Nairobi (KE), St. James's Hospital (IE), Netanya Academic College (IL), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Alzheimer's Association, Global Brain Health Institute, Alzheimer's Society
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.