Communion Contested; Luther and Karlstadt on 1 Corinthians 10

Abstract: Karlstadt was one of the first reformers who challenged Luther's theology of the Lord's Supper. His insistence that the sacrament was an act of remembrance prompted Luther to emphasize the physical presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper. Due to the exegetical nature of the controversy, this study examines their respective readings of 1 Cor. 10:16 in detail, through Luther's Against the Heavenly Prophets and Karlstadt's Explanation from early 1525. While their sacramental theologies were often considered diametrically opposed, the present analysis attempts to balance this view by examining their exegetical assumptions and rhetorical strategies. Considering the reception of this controversy, it becomes apparent that some of the exegetical arguments of the later conflict between Wittenberg and the Swiss Reformers are already present in this early sacramental controversy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Lutheran quarterly
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lut.2026.a983994
Primary Topic
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communion Contested; Luther and Karlstadt on 1 Corinthians 10

Johannes Schimohr
Lutheran quarterly
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
article

Communion Contested; Luther and Karlstadt on 1 Corinthians 10

Johannes Schimohr
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Karlstadt was one of the first reformers who challenged Luther's theology of the Lord's Supper. His insistence that the sacrament was an act of remembrance prompted Luther to emphasize the physical presence of Christ in the Lord's Supper. Due to the exegetical nature of the controversy, this study examines their respective readings of 1 Cor. 10:16 in detail, through Luther's Against the Heavenly Prophets and Karlstadt's Explanation from early 1525. While their sacramental theologies were often considered diametrically opposed, the present analysis attempts to balance this view by examining their exegetical assumptions and rhetorical strategies. Considering the reception of this controversy, it becomes apparent that some of the exegetical arguments of the later conflict between Wittenberg and the Swiss Reformers are already present in this early sacramental controversy.

Lutheran quarterlyVol. 40(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.