Leap, frog: Toad-proof agricultural infrastructure for landscape-level management of cane toads.

Agriculture is an increasingly dominant land use across the globe. Habitat modification associated with agricultural expansion is both directly and indirectly impacting biodiversity. One way that agricultural habitat modification impacts biodiversity is by facilitating the spread and persistence of invasive species. The provision of artificial water sources to sustain livestock in semi-arid regions of Australia, for example, has allowed toxic invasive cane toads ( Rhinella marina ) to spread into otherwise inhospitable regions. Throughout the region, artificial watering points consist of bore-fed dams that facilitate toad breeding and hydration. Modelling suggests that preventing cane toads from accessing artificial watering points in arid regions could dramatically limit their spread. Thus, the challenge is to design watering infrastructure that serves agricultural needs but denies water to toads during the dry season. In this study, we tested the ability of cane toads to overcome barriers to reach water. We conducted experiments testing the jumping and climbing ability of adult cane toads, as well as their capacity to jump or climb over fences and into water troughs. Our findings revealed that >99% of toads are unable to breach barriers ≥51 cm high. We also found that material choice and trough design affect the probability of breach by toads. Shade cloth was a more effective fencing material cover than was plastic, and concrete troughs with a rounded lip proved more difficult for toads to enter than plastic troughs with a grippable edge. Commercially available precast concrete troughs were found to be particularly effective at excluding toads, and are still an accessible height for calves. These findings suggest that fencing and/or converting open dams to tank-fed cattle troughs could prevent cane toad persistence and spread through arid landscapes while maintaining agricultural operations. Thus, simple upgrades to agricultural infrastructure could prove crucial in reducing the invasive distribution of toads and preventing further spread into biodiversity-rich areas like the Pilbara region of Western Australia. • Toad-proof troughs curb invasive spread while supporting arid-zone agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04135
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leap, frog: Toad-proof agricultural infrastructure for landscape-level management of cane toads.

Phillips Ben, J. P. Dunlop, Chris Jolly, Bas van der Ploeg et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Leap, frog: Toad-proof agricultural infrastructure for landscape-level management of cane toads.

Phillips Ben, J. P. Dunlop, Chris Jolly, Bas van der Ploeg, Alexander T. Funk, Andrew Coates
article en

Abstract

Agriculture is an increasingly dominant land use across the globe. Habitat modification associated with agricultural expansion is both directly and indirectly impacting biodiversity. One way that agricultural habitat modification impacts biodiversity is by facilitating the spread and persistence of invasive species. The provision of artificial water sources to sustain livestock in semi-arid regions of Australia, for example, has allowed toxic invasive cane toads ( Rhinella marina ) to spread into otherwise inhospitable regions. Throughout the region, artificial watering points consist of bore-fed dams that facilitate toad breeding and hydration. Modelling suggests that preventing cane toads from accessing artificial watering points in arid regions could dramatically limit their spread. Thus, the challenge is to design watering infrastructure that serves agricultural needs but denies water to toads during the dry season. In this study, we tested the ability of cane toads to overcome barriers to reach water. We conducted experiments testing the jumping and climbing ability of adult cane toads, as well as their capacity to jump or climb over fences and into water troughs. Our findings revealed that >99% of toads are unable to breach barriers ≥51 cm high. We also found that material choice and trough design affect the probability of breach by toads. Shade cloth was a more effective fencing material cover than was plastic, and concrete troughs with a rounded lip proved more difficult for toads to enter than plastic troughs with a grippable edge. Commercially available precast concrete troughs were found to be particularly effective at excluding toads, and are still an accessible height for calves. These findings suggest that fencing and/or converting open dams to tank-fed cattle troughs could prevent cane toad persistence and spread through arid landscapes while maintaining agricultural operations. Thus, simple upgrades to agricultural infrastructure could prove crucial in reducing the invasive distribution of toads and preventing further spread into biodiversity-rich areas like the Pilbara region of Western Australia. • Toad-proof troughs curb invasive spread while supporting arid-zone agriculture.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 67
The University of Western Australia (AU), Curtin University (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.