Quality or quantity? Exploring mechanisms linking producer subsidy to soybean production by DID models

The implementation of the producer subsidy marks a pivotal shift in China’s grain price regulation, transitioning from direct interventions to more market-based policies. However, the specific effects of such policies on food supply remain obscure. This study leverages panel data from eight soybean-producing provinces in China during 2012–2022, and employs difference-in-differences (DID) models, to assess the dual impacts of the subsidy on both the quantity and quality of soybean production. The findings indicate that while the policy significantly boosted soybean yield per capita and per unit area, its effect on improving soybean quality was limited. Moreover, the policy led to a notable decline in the number of grain farmers, reducing labor supply in agriculture, while simultaneously encouraging higher levels of mechanization, as farmers increased investments in non-labor inputs for soybean cultivation. The implications of findings are essential for developing a sustainable grain industry that ensures both the quantity and quality of national food security.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2026.2634425
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality or quantity? Exploring mechanisms linking producer subsidy to soybean production by DID models

Xieqihua Liu, Hao Wang, Chao Feng, Zhu Yi et al.
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

Quality or quantity? Exploring mechanisms linking producer subsidy to soybean production by DID models

Xieqihua Liu, Hao Wang, Chao Feng, Zhu Yi, Jiansong Zheng, Qiaoran Jia, Xi Wang
article en

Abstract

The implementation of the producer subsidy marks a pivotal shift in China’s grain price regulation, transitioning from direct interventions to more market-based policies. However, the specific effects of such policies on food supply remain obscure. This study leverages panel data from eight soybean-producing provinces in China during 2012–2022, and employs difference-in-differences (DID) models, to assess the dual impacts of the subsidy on both the quantity and quality of soybean production. The findings indicate that while the policy significantly boosted soybean yield per capita and per unit area, its effect on improving soybean quality was limited. Moreover, the policy led to a notable decline in the number of grain farmers, reducing labor supply in agriculture, while simultaneously encouraging higher levels of mechanization, as farmers increased investments in non-labor inputs for soybean cultivation. The implications of findings are essential for developing a sustainable grain industry that ensures both the quantity and quality of national food security.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 12(1)
Macao Polytechnic University (MO), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.