Systematic investigation of preprocessing pipeline for MALDI data

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS) is a powerful tool to detect and characterize biomolecules, making it particularly useful in different fields and applications such as proteomics, clinical diagnostics, and biomarker discovery. MALDI data is commonly contaminated by the artefacts originated from both chemical and electrical noise. Data preprocessing is hence important to remove these artefacts and improve the accuracy and reliability of the subsequent (quantitative and qualitative) analysis. A systematic investigation of different preprocessing steps is necessary to establish an effective preprocessing pipeline. In this study, we systematically investigated the different steps including interpolation, smoothing, baseline correction, peak alignment, and peak binning, along with normalization to establish a preprocessing pipeline of MALDI spectral data. The performance of the preprocessing steps and pipeline was benchmarked by the balanced accuracy of differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and healthy (normal) based on MALDI spectral data of liver tissue samples. The established preprocessing pipeline improved the balanced accuracy from 61.3% to 77.6% under the patient-level cross-validation, and from 92.9% to 94.7% under spectral-level cross-validation. Our findings demonstrated that the classification performance can be greatly affected by the quality of MALDI data, which can be improved by preprocessing steps. The small difference between the patient-level and spectral-level validations from our analysis demonstrated well a satisfying performance of the classification against patient-to-patient variability with the help of our preprocessing pipeline. This study will potentially benefit the MS community. Preprocessing steps were systematically investigated according to the classification performance to separate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) against Normal samples. Each step was incrementally added to the preprocessing pipeline. An optimal preprocessing pipeline was established by making sure the classification performance was progressively improved through the preprocessing steps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Chemistry
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103175
Primary Topic
Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic investigation of preprocessing pipeline for MALDI data

Oleg Ryabchykov, Mou Adhikari, Shuxia Guo, Thomas Bocklitz
Results in Chemistry
Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
article

Systematic investigation of preprocessing pipeline for MALDI data

Oleg Ryabchykov, Mou Adhikari, Shuxia Guo, Thomas Bocklitz
article en

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS) is a powerful tool to detect and characterize biomolecules, making it particularly useful in different fields and applications such as proteomics, clinical diagnostics, and biomarker discovery. MALDI data is commonly contaminated by the artefacts originated from both chemical and electrical noise. Data preprocessing is hence important to remove these artefacts and improve the accuracy and reliability of the subsequent (quantitative and qualitative) analysis. A systematic investigation of different preprocessing steps is necessary to establish an effective preprocessing pipeline. In this study, we systematically investigated the different steps including interpolation, smoothing, baseline correction, peak alignment, and peak binning, along with normalization to establish a preprocessing pipeline of MALDI spectral data. The performance of the preprocessing steps and pipeline was benchmarked by the balanced accuracy of differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and healthy (normal) based on MALDI spectral data of liver tissue samples. The established preprocessing pipeline improved the balanced accuracy from 61.3% to 77.6% under the patient-level cross-validation, and from 92.9% to 94.7% under spectral-level cross-validation. Our findings demonstrated that the classification performance can be greatly affected by the quality of MALDI data, which can be improved by preprocessing steps. The small difference between the patient-level and spectral-level validations from our analysis demonstrated well a satisfying performance of the classification against patient-to-patient variability with the help of our preprocessing pipeline. This study will potentially benefit the MS community. Preprocessing steps were systematically investigated according to the classification performance to separate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) against Normal samples. Each step was incrementally added to the preprocessing pipeline. An optimal preprocessing pipeline was established by making sure the classification performance was progressively improved through the preprocessing steps.

Results in ChemistryVol. 24
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.