Macrophytes-based solutions as tools to halt the collapse of freshwater biodiversity, functions and benefits

Aquatic ecosystems worldwide are increasingly degraded by eutrophication, habitat loss, hydrological alterations, invasive species, and climate change. At the same time, macrophytes–widely regarded as eco-pillars of aquatic ecosystems–are gaining recognition as key components in Nature‑based Solutions (NbS). However, there remains a need to integrate, consolidate and disseminate evidence on macrophyte multifunctional roles, effectiveness and limitations. This paper aims to (i) position macrophyte-based interventions within the NbS framework; (ii) draw on exemplary global case studies to identify enabling and limiting factors, (iii) summarize the mechanistic through which macrophytes enhance the delivery of irreplaceable ecosystem benefits; and (iv) provide recommendations for scaling up effective macrophyte‑based restoration strategies. A synthesis of recent, high-quality studies (2020–2026) was conducted, encompassing experimental/field trials, reviews, and meta-analyses across diverse geographical contexts; not neglecting environmental, social, technical, and governance dimensions. Key findings indicate that macrophyte restoration significantly reduces nitrogen, phosphorus, and phytoplankton biomass. Improvements in water clarity, sediment stability, habitat complexity, and microbial community composition further contribute to ecosystem recovery. Restoration success, however, is highly dependent on site‑specific conditions; while common limitations include internal trophic load, extreme disturbances, inadequate long‑term monitoring, and socio‑institutional constraints. Macrophyte-based solutions (MbS) emerge as essential tools for achieving NbS objectives in aquatic ecosystem restoration. To maximize their effectiveness, such interventions must be grounded in thorough contextual assessments, employ adaptive management strategies, and ensure active stakeholder engagement, sufficient funding, and robust monitoring frameworks. Future efforts should recognize macrophytes not only as targets of restoration but also as powerful agents of ecological recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Ecology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00027-y
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Macrophytes-based solutions as tools to halt the collapse of freshwater biodiversity, functions and benefits

Rossano Bolpagni
Discover Ecology
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
article

Macrophytes-based solutions as tools to halt the collapse of freshwater biodiversity, functions and benefits

Rossano Bolpagni
article en

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems worldwide are increasingly degraded by eutrophication, habitat loss, hydrological alterations, invasive species, and climate change. At the same time, macrophytes–widely regarded as eco-pillars of aquatic ecosystems–are gaining recognition as key components in Nature‑based Solutions (NbS). However, there remains a need to integrate, consolidate and disseminate evidence on macrophyte multifunctional roles, effectiveness and limitations. This paper aims to (i) position macrophyte-based interventions within the NbS framework; (ii) draw on exemplary global case studies to identify enabling and limiting factors, (iii) summarize the mechanistic through which macrophytes enhance the delivery of irreplaceable ecosystem benefits; and (iv) provide recommendations for scaling up effective macrophyte‑based restoration strategies. A synthesis of recent, high-quality studies (2020–2026) was conducted, encompassing experimental/field trials, reviews, and meta-analyses across diverse geographical contexts; not neglecting environmental, social, technical, and governance dimensions. Key findings indicate that macrophyte restoration significantly reduces nitrogen, phosphorus, and phytoplankton biomass. Improvements in water clarity, sediment stability, habitat complexity, and microbial community composition further contribute to ecosystem recovery. Restoration success, however, is highly dependent on site‑specific conditions; while common limitations include internal trophic load, extreme disturbances, inadequate long‑term monitoring, and socio‑institutional constraints. Macrophyte-based solutions (MbS) emerge as essential tools for achieving NbS objectives in aquatic ecosystem restoration. To maximize their effectiveness, such interventions must be grounded in thorough contextual assessments, employ adaptive management strategies, and ensure active stakeholder engagement, sufficient funding, and robust monitoring frameworks. Future efforts should recognize macrophytes not only as targets of restoration but also as powerful agents of ecological recovery.

Discover EcologyVol. 2(1)
University of Parma (IT)
Dipartimenti di Eccellenza, European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.