Ultra-high-dimensional threshold selection for quantile feature screening with false discovery rate error rate control: a case study on high blood pressure analysis

Identifying important genetic risk factors for high blood pressure is paramount for targeted interventions and comprehensive management strategies for this prevalent health condition. With ultra-high-dimensional genetic factors, feature screening plays a vital role in retaining the important risk factors and screening out the unimportant ones. However, its efficacy depends on selecting the appropriate threshold in different data contexts. We propose a novel quantile mirror (QM) approach for data-adaptive threshold selection with false discovery rate (FDR) control in quantile feature screening, where abnormally high blood pressure levels are of the most interest. The symmetric QM statistics enable the estimation of the FDR. Multiple data splitting is employed for result stability, and different thresholds are allowed for different quantiles. Additionally, we introduce the Quantile REflection via Data Splitting (QREDS) and the Hard Threshold with QREDS feature screening procedures. We apply our proposed methods to the Framingham Heart Study data. While many of the retained high-blood-pressure-related genetic features are validated from medical literature, some new risk factors are discovered. We show that our proposed procedures asymptotically control the FDR under suitable conditions. We further demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through extensive numerical analysis and simulation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrics
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujag035
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultra-high-dimensional threshold selection for quantile feature screening with false discovery rate error rate control: a case study on high blood pressure analysis

Zhigen Zhao, Saidat Abidemi Sanni, Yan Yu
Biometrics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Ultra-high-dimensional threshold selection for quantile feature screening with false discovery rate error rate control: a case study on high blood pressure analysis

Zhigen Zhao, Saidat Abidemi Sanni, Yan Yu
article en

Abstract

Identifying important genetic risk factors for high blood pressure is paramount for targeted interventions and comprehensive management strategies for this prevalent health condition. With ultra-high-dimensional genetic factors, feature screening plays a vital role in retaining the important risk factors and screening out the unimportant ones. However, its efficacy depends on selecting the appropriate threshold in different data contexts. We propose a novel quantile mirror (QM) approach for data-adaptive threshold selection with false discovery rate (FDR) control in quantile feature screening, where abnormally high blood pressure levels are of the most interest. The symmetric QM statistics enable the estimation of the FDR. Multiple data splitting is employed for result stability, and different thresholds are allowed for different quantiles. Additionally, we introduce the Quantile REflection via Data Splitting (QREDS) and the Hard Threshold with QREDS feature screening procedures. We apply our proposed methods to the Framingham Heart Study data. While many of the retained high-blood-pressure-related genetic features are validated from medical literature, some new risk factors are discovered. We show that our proposed procedures asymptotically control the FDR under suitable conditions. We further demonstrate the performance of the proposed methods through extensive numerical analysis and simulation studies.

BiometricsVol. 82(1)
The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Temple University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.