Comprehensive Review of Phase Change Materials for Building Applications: Passive, Active, and Hybrid Systems (2022–2025)

Phase change materials (PCMs) have emerged as a key enabler of high-performance, low-carbon buildings through latent heat-based thermal energy storage. This paper presents a systematic and critical synthesis of advances in PCM technologies for building applications published between 2022 and 2025, analyzing over 300 peer-reviewed studies to evaluate thermal performance, economic viability, environmental impact, and climate adaptability across three integration approaches: passive, active, and hybrid systems. The studies analyzed show that passive envelope integration employing macroencapsulated or form-stable PCMs in walls, roofs, and glazing is reported to deliver 15–45% energy savings with payback periods of 8–15 years, primarily through enhanced thermal inertia and indoor temperature stabilization. Active systems, which couple PCMs with HVAC, heat pumps, or air handling units, are found to achieve 20–40% energy reductions and shorter payback periods (3–8 years) by enabling load shifting, peak shaving, and improved coefficient of performance (COP). Hybrid configurations integrating passive and active strategies with AI-driven control demonstrate, in the literature, the highest potential, with reported energy savings of up to 50%, though they entail greater complexity and capital cost. The review further highlights material-level innovations, including ternary composite PCMs, bio-based alternatives, and nano-enhanced formulations that address intrinsic limitations such as low thermal conductivity (0.1–0.3 W/m·K for organics) and cycling instability. Despite significant progress, critical gaps persist in standardized testing protocols, long-term field validation, comprehensive lifecycle assessments, and real-world scalability, particularly in tropical and cold climates. By bridging material science, building physics, and energy system engineering, this work provides a forward-looking roadmap to accelerate the deployment of PCM-based solutions in the global decarbonization of the built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051151
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Review of Phase Change Materials for Building Applications: Passive, Active, and Hybrid Systems (2022–2025)

Abir Hmida, Thanina Hammouma, Abdelkader Laafer, Mahmoud Bourouis
Energies
Phase Change Materials Research
article

Comprehensive Review of Phase Change Materials for Building Applications: Passive, Active, and Hybrid Systems (2022–2025)

Abir Hmida, Thanina Hammouma, Abdelkader Laafer, Mahmoud Bourouis
article en

Abstract

Phase change materials (PCMs) have emerged as a key enabler of high-performance, low-carbon buildings through latent heat-based thermal energy storage. This paper presents a systematic and critical synthesis of advances in PCM technologies for building applications published between 2022 and 2025, analyzing over 300 peer-reviewed studies to evaluate thermal performance, economic viability, environmental impact, and climate adaptability across three integration approaches: passive, active, and hybrid systems. The studies analyzed show that passive envelope integration employing macroencapsulated or form-stable PCMs in walls, roofs, and glazing is reported to deliver 15–45% energy savings with payback periods of 8–15 years, primarily through enhanced thermal inertia and indoor temperature stabilization. Active systems, which couple PCMs with HVAC, heat pumps, or air handling units, are found to achieve 20–40% energy reductions and shorter payback periods (3–8 years) by enabling load shifting, peak shaving, and improved coefficient of performance (COP). Hybrid configurations integrating passive and active strategies with AI-driven control demonstrate, in the literature, the highest potential, with reported energy savings of up to 50%, though they entail greater complexity and capital cost. The review further highlights material-level innovations, including ternary composite PCMs, bio-based alternatives, and nano-enhanced formulations that address intrinsic limitations such as low thermal conductivity (0.1–0.3 W/m·K for organics) and cycling instability. Despite significant progress, critical gaps persist in standardized testing protocols, long-term field validation, comprehensive lifecycle assessments, and real-world scalability, particularly in tropical and cold climates. By bridging material science, building physics, and energy system engineering, this work provides a forward-looking roadmap to accelerate the deployment of PCM-based solutions in the global decarbonization of the built environment.

EnergiesVol. 19(5)
University of Liège (BE), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (CA), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES), University of Blida (DZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Phase Change Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.