Components and methodology of evidence briefs for policy: the need for evaluation tools
Methodological shortcomings were identified in the EBPs from both the supply-side and demand-side perspectives, highlighting the need to validate and better implement existing tools and to complement existing guidelines.
Authors
- Marge Reinap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5836-7516)
- Xue Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5552-8026)
- Evelina Chapman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5979-6718)
- Xiuxia Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0210-9793)
- Yuehua Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1343-7449)
- Laurenz Mahlanza-Langer
- Ludovic Reveiz
- Ruixin Li
- Xuping Song
- Qiyin Luo
- Laura Boeira
- Tanja Kuchenmüller
- John Lavis
- Kehu Yang
Institutions
- Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
- World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK)
- World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (DK)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Evidence Based Research (United States) (US)
- Knowledge Foundation (SE)
- China National Health Development Research Center (CN)
- Guideline Geo (Sweden) (SE)
- Lanzhou University (CN)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Research Policy and Systems
- Published
- 2026-02-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01451-y
- Primary Topic
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- McMaster University
- Lanzhou University
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities