Epigenetically Active Supplements and the Risk of Sports Injuries: Narrative Review from Molecular Mechanisms to Practical Implications

Background/Objectives Sports-related musculoskeletal injuries remain a major challenge in physically active populations, with substantial interindividual variability in susceptibility and recovery that cannot be fully explained by biomechanics or genetics alone. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, provide a dynamic interface through which mechanical loading, inflammation, and metabolic signals regulate gene expression during tissue adaptation and repair. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on "epigenetically active" dietary supplements and their potential relevance to sports injuries, focusing on methyl donors, polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, and redox-active nutrients. Methods Targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000-2026) were performed using epigenetics-, injury-, exercise-, and supplementation-related terms, prioritizing mechanistic and translational evidence. Results Available data indicate that these compounds can influence molecular mechanisms implicated in musculoskeletal recovery. However, human evidence is largely derived from peripheral tissues and indirect molecular markers, with limited clear linkage to clinically significant injury outcomes such as injury incidence, severity, or return-to-play timelines. Accordingly, these nutrients are best viewed as modulators of recovery-related biology rather than as direct therapeutic agents. Conclusions This review highlights a notable translational gap between mechanistic plausibility and clinical evidence and discusses practical implications for sports nutrition from a personalized perspective. Future research priorities include tissue-relevant epigenetic assessments, integration of multi-omics approaches, and longitudinal trials incorporating injury endpoints. Nutritional epigenomics, therefore, represents a promising avenue to support musculoskeletal health while underscoring the need for rigorous clinical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18050762
Primary Topic
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epigenetically Active Supplements and the Risk of Sports Injuries: Narrative Review from Molecular Mechanisms to Practical Implications

Agata Leońska-Duniec
Nutrients
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
article

Epigenetically Active Supplements and the Risk of Sports Injuries: Narrative Review from Molecular Mechanisms to Practical Implications

Agata Leońska-Duniec
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives Sports-related musculoskeletal injuries remain a major challenge in physically active populations, with substantial interindividual variability in susceptibility and recovery that cannot be fully explained by biomechanics or genetics alone. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, provide a dynamic interface through which mechanical loading, inflammation, and metabolic signals regulate gene expression during tissue adaptation and repair. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on "epigenetically active" dietary supplements and their potential relevance to sports injuries, focusing on methyl donors, polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, vitamin D, and redox-active nutrients. Methods Targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000-2026) were performed using epigenetics-, injury-, exercise-, and supplementation-related terms, prioritizing mechanistic and translational evidence. Results Available data indicate that these compounds can influence molecular mechanisms implicated in musculoskeletal recovery. However, human evidence is largely derived from peripheral tissues and indirect molecular markers, with limited clear linkage to clinically significant injury outcomes such as injury incidence, severity, or return-to-play timelines. Accordingly, these nutrients are best viewed as modulators of recovery-related biology rather than as direct therapeutic agents. Conclusions This review highlights a notable translational gap between mechanistic plausibility and clinical evidence and discusses practical implications for sports nutrition from a personalized perspective. Future research priorities include tissue-relevant epigenetic assessments, integration of multi-omics approaches, and longitudinal trials incorporating injury endpoints. Nutritional epigenomics, therefore, represents a promising avenue to support musculoskeletal health while underscoring the need for rigorous clinical validation.

NutrientsVol. 18(5)
Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport (PL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Muscle metabolism and nutrition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.