Tourism infrastructure and physiological stress in free-ranging impalas (Aepyceros melampus) of Serengeti National Park

In the developing world, many protected areas (PAs) rely on tourism as a viable source of financial resources for conservation. However, the drive to maximise revenue has led to an increase in tourist numbers and infrastructure developments that often exceed ecological capacity, creating challenges for biodiversity and wildlife populations. To evaluate potential physiological impacts of tourism infrastructure and environmental factors, we measured faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs), an established indicator of stress in animals, using a validated enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We analysed FGMs from 213 impala (Aepyceros melampus) faecal samples collected in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, between January and February 2025. Our results showed that impalas near lodges exhibited significantly higher FGM levels even without tourist occupancy (i.e., infrastructure), than those near permanent tented camps or seasonal campsites. These findings suggest that large-scale tourism infrastructure is associated with elevated stress in impalas. Future research should focus on identifying the specific features of large tourist facilities that drive physiological stress in wildlife, to better inform tourism development and conservation strategies in PAs. • Protected areas in many developing countries increasingly depend on tourism revenue to fund conservation. • Infrastructure expansion linked to tourism often exceeds ecological capacity, posing risks to wildlife. • In Serengeti National Park, large-scale tourist infrastructure can elevate wildlife stress, even without tourist presence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04130
Primary Topic
Turtle Biology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tourism infrastructure and physiological stress in free-ranging impalas (Aepyceros melampus) of Serengeti National Park

Peter S. Ranke, Eivin Røskaft, Beatrice Modest Kessy, Augustine Arukwe et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Turtle Biology and Conservation
article

Tourism infrastructure and physiological stress in free-ranging impalas (Aepyceros melampus) of Serengeti National Park

Peter S. Ranke, Eivin Røskaft, Beatrice Modest Kessy, Augustine Arukwe, Franco Peniel Mbise, Kwaslema Malle Hariohay, Rupert Palme
article en

Abstract

In the developing world, many protected areas (PAs) rely on tourism as a viable source of financial resources for conservation. However, the drive to maximise revenue has led to an increase in tourist numbers and infrastructure developments that often exceed ecological capacity, creating challenges for biodiversity and wildlife populations. To evaluate potential physiological impacts of tourism infrastructure and environmental factors, we measured faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs), an established indicator of stress in animals, using a validated enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We analysed FGMs from 213 impala (Aepyceros melampus) faecal samples collected in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, between January and February 2025. Our results showed that impalas near lodges exhibited significantly higher FGM levels even without tourist occupancy (i.e., infrastructure), than those near permanent tented camps or seasonal campsites. These findings suggest that large-scale tourism infrastructure is associated with elevated stress in impalas. Future research should focus on identifying the specific features of large tourist facilities that drive physiological stress in wildlife, to better inform tourism development and conservation strategies in PAs. • Protected areas in many developing countries increasingly depend on tourism revenue to fund conservation. • Infrastructure expansion linked to tourism often exceeds ecological capacity, posing risks to wildlife. • In Serengeti National Park, large-scale tourist infrastructure can elevate wildlife stress, even without tourist presence.

Global Ecology and ConservationVol. 67
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), The University of Dodoma (TZ), College of African Wildlife Management (TZ), Tanzania National Parks (TZ), Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NO), MarLife (Norway) (NO)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Turtle Biology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.