Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Caries Detection and Endodontic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Aim To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in caries detection and endodontic diagnosis. Materials and Methods A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023445906). Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Wiley) were searched for studies published from January 1, 2001 to September 30, 2025. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing AI for diagnostic accuracy in caries detection or endodontic conditions, and the prognostic prediction of treatment outcomes. Primary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic validity. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Results From 455 records, 68 studies were included; most evidence is retrospective and experimental. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), U-Net, ResNet, and YOLO models demonstrated diagnostic accuracies ranging from 86.9% to 95% (95% CI where reported). Sensitivity for periapical lesion identification reached 97.8%, and precision for root morphology analysis and working length determination exceeded 90% in several studies. Prognostic applications showed potential in predicting retreatment success and supporting clinical decisions, though heterogeneity limited pooled analysis. External validation was rarely performed. Conclusion AI models show promising diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in caries and endodontic applications, with consistently high performance across tasks. However, most studies were limited by narrow datasets, methodological variability, and lack of external validation. Current evidence supports cautious optimism, but further high-quality trials and real-world validation are needed before widespread clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/30497418261421761
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Caries Detection and Endodontic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Vineeta Nikhil, Anand Bansod, Dhaval Desai, Dr Panshul Kharche et al.
Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Caries Detection and Endodontic Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

Vineeta Nikhil, Anand Bansod, Dhaval Desai, Dr Panshul Kharche, Ruchika Pandey, Preeti Mishra
article en

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in caries detection and endodontic diagnosis. Materials and Methods A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023445906). Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Wiley) were searched for studies published from January 1, 2001 to September 30, 2025. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials and observational studies assessing AI for diagnostic accuracy in caries detection or endodontic conditions, and the prognostic prediction of treatment outcomes. Primary outcomes were diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic validity. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I. Results From 455 records, 68 studies were included; most evidence is retrospective and experimental. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), U-Net, ResNet, and YOLO models demonstrated diagnostic accuracies ranging from 86.9% to 95% (95% CI where reported). Sensitivity for periapical lesion identification reached 97.8%, and precision for root morphology analysis and working length determination exceeded 90% in several studies. Prognostic applications showed potential in predicting retreatment success and supporting clinical decisions, though heterogeneity limited pooled analysis. External validation was rarely performed. Conclusion AI models show promising diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in caries and endodontic applications, with consistently high performance across tasks. However, most studies were limited by narrow datasets, methodological variability, and lack of external validation. Current evidence supports cautious optimism, but further high-quality trials and real-world validation are needed before widespread clinical adoption.

Journal of Applied Dentistry and Oral Sciences
Dharmsinh Desai University (IN), Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (IT), Subharti Medical College (IN), Maharashtra Forest Department (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.