Reflections on the Inclusive Co-Design Process of a Virtual Assistant for Individuals With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

This study shows that, to accommodate an inclusive research and design process, tensions between project efficiency and meaningful inclusion need to be addressed, underlining the importance of continuous coordination, collaboration, and flexibility in transdisciplinary settings. Further, applying a stepwise approach in inclusive collaborations supports coordination, continuous evaluation, and flexibility. Inclusive methods, like preparatory activities, clear role division, accessible materials, and iterative feedback, enabled active co-researcher participation. These methods contributed to a shift in ownership, allowing co-researchers to gain greater influence and co-shape both the development process and the content. The findings provide insights into how to enhance equity and relevance in inclusive technology design for individuals with complex care needs, such as individuals with a mild intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Human Factors
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/81941
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on the Inclusive Co-Design Process of a Virtual Assistant for Individuals With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

Geraline L. Leusink, Jenneken Naaldenberg, Kirsten E. Bevelander, Anneke W C van der Cruijsen et al.
JMIR Human Factors
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Reflections on the Inclusive Co-Design Process of a Virtual Assistant for Individuals With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study

Geraline L. Leusink, Jenneken Naaldenberg, Kirsten E. Bevelander, Anneke W C van der Cruijsen, Julia F E van Calis
article en

Abstract

This study shows that, to accommodate an inclusive research and design process, tensions between project efficiency and meaningful inclusion need to be addressed, underlining the importance of continuous coordination, collaboration, and flexibility in transdisciplinary settings. Further, applying a stepwise approach in inclusive collaborations supports coordination, continuous evaluation, and flexibility. Inclusive methods, like preparatory activities, clear role division, accessible materials, and iterative feedback, enabled active co-researcher participation. These methods contributed to a shift in ownership, allowing co-researchers to gain greater influence and co-shape both the development process and the content. The findings provide insights into how to enhance equity and relevance in inclusive technology design for individuals with complex care needs, such as individuals with a mild intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder.

JMIR Human FactorsVol. 13
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Collaborative Group (United States) (US)
ZonMw
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.