Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation for reliable power production in cold climates

Geothermal energy, as a wide-spread and low-/zero-carbon source, can help address ongoing and emerging global challenges associated with environmental issues and energy supply reliability. This research reports on an Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation to address the long-term power demands of areas in cold climates with appropriate geothermal potential. A northern Canadian community-Fort Liard (FL), above a hot sedimentary aquifer in the Northwest Territories (NT)-was selected as a representative cold-climate area for this research. Three operational scenarios were considered for a 30-year lifetime: Scenario 1-a geothermal-based plant supplying FL's power needs; Scenario 2-the plant working at its maximum capacity continuously; and Scenario 3-the geothermal-based plant operating for eleven months, with a diesel facility employed only in June. The primary research's originality is to utilize real community data/information and system components prices/costs to derive 3E outcomes. The techno-energy analysis indicates that all three scenarios can deliver the stable baseload electric power required by FL. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 is ~ 0.182, ~ 0.074, and ~ 0.176 CAD$/kWh, respectively, while FL's current diesel facility-excluding the government diesel subsidy-incurs a substantially higher LCOE of ~ 0.70 CAD$/kWh. Considering factors such as inflation and discount rates, the economic analysis indicates that for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) values are, respectively, 14.1, 27.8, and 14%, whereas the Return on Investment (ROI) times are, respectively, ~ 10.7, ~ 5.4, and ~ 10.8 years. Environmentally, Scenarios 1 and 2 have minor impacts, while Scenario 3 results in pollution due to utilizing the diesel facility in June. This 3E analysis can be extended to other remote, isolated, and cold-climate areas with favourable geothermal resources and similar geological and social conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39264-2
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation for reliable power production in cold climates

Andrew Wigston, Jatin Nathwani, Alireza Dehghani-Sanij, Maurice B. Dusseault et al.
Scientific Reports
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation for reliable power production in cold climates

Andrew Wigston, Jatin Nathwani, Alireza Dehghani-Sanij, Maurice B. Dusseault, Nima Khakzad, Roydon Fraser
article en

Abstract

Geothermal energy, as a wide-spread and low-/zero-carbon source, can help address ongoing and emerging global challenges associated with environmental issues and energy supply reliability. This research reports on an Energy, Economic and Environmental (3E) analysis of geothermal-based plant operation to address the long-term power demands of areas in cold climates with appropriate geothermal potential. A northern Canadian community-Fort Liard (FL), above a hot sedimentary aquifer in the Northwest Territories (NT)-was selected as a representative cold-climate area for this research. Three operational scenarios were considered for a 30-year lifetime: Scenario 1-a geothermal-based plant supplying FL's power needs; Scenario 2-the plant working at its maximum capacity continuously; and Scenario 3-the geothermal-based plant operating for eleven months, with a diesel facility employed only in June. The primary research's originality is to utilize real community data/information and system components prices/costs to derive 3E outcomes. The techno-energy analysis indicates that all three scenarios can deliver the stable baseload electric power required by FL. The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 is ~ 0.182, ~ 0.074, and ~ 0.176 CAD$/kWh, respectively, while FL's current diesel facility-excluding the government diesel subsidy-incurs a substantially higher LCOE of ~ 0.70 CAD$/kWh. Considering factors such as inflation and discount rates, the economic analysis indicates that for Scenarios 1, 2, and 3, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) values are, respectively, 14.1, 27.8, and 14%, whereas the Return on Investment (ROI) times are, respectively, ~ 10.7, ~ 5.4, and ~ 10.8 years. Environmentally, Scenarios 1 and 2 have minor impacts, while Scenario 3 results in pollution due to utilizing the diesel facility in June. This 3E analysis can be extended to other remote, isolated, and cold-climate areas with favourable geothermal resources and similar geological and social conditions.

Scientific Reports
Natural Resources Canada (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), Toronto Public Health (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.