Testing the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF): Permanent Uncertainty, Institutional Crisis Logics, and Stratified Social Outcomes

Abstract: Contemporary societies increasingly operate under conditions of chronic instability rather than episodic crisis, raising urgent questions about how equality functions under permanent uncertainty. This study empirically tests the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF), which proposes that sustained instability normalizes crisis-oriented institutional logics, destabilizes equality processes, and produces stratified social outcomes through differential adaptive capacity and recursive trust dynamics. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) with a sample of 180 adults, we estimated direct, moderated, and recursive pathways among permanent uncertainty, crisis-oriented institutional logics, equality disruption, adaptive capacity, adaptive advantage, accumulated disadvantage, and institutional trust. Results indicate that permanent uncertainty strongly predicts crisis-oriented institutional logics (β = .59, p < .001), which in turn predict equality disruption (β = .55, p < .001). Equality disruption reduces adaptive advantage (β = −.46, p < .001) and increases accumulated disadvantage (β = .60, p < .001), producing structured divergence. Latent interaction effects demonstrate that adaptive capacity buffers, but does not eliminate, divergence pathways. Accumulated disadvantage erodes institutional trust, which recursively reinforces perceptions of permanent uncertainty. Model fit indices indicate excellent fit (CFI = .96, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .04). These findings validate EDF as a mechanism-based explanation of how equality becomes destabilized under chronic instability and demonstrate that inequality and uncertainty operate as mutually reinforcing structural processes. Keywords: permanent uncertainty; equality disruption; crisis-oriented governance; adaptive capacity; accumulated disadvantage; institutional trust; social transformation; structural equation modeling. Title: Testing the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF): Permanent Uncertainty, Institutional Crisis Logics, and Stratified Social Outcomes Author: Dr. David Bull International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), ISSN 2348-3164 (online) Vol. 14, Issue 1, January 2026 - March 2026 Page No: 144-166 Research Publish Journals Website: www.researchpublish.com Published Date: 23-February-2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18744493 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/testing-the-equality-disruption-framework-edf-permanent-uncertainty-institutional-crisis-logics-and-stratified-social-outcomes

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18744492
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF): Permanent Uncertainty, Institutional Crisis Logics, and Stratified Social Outcomes

Dr. David Bull
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Social Capital and Networks
article

Testing the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF): Permanent Uncertainty, Institutional Crisis Logics, and Stratified Social Outcomes

Dr. David Bull
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Contemporary societies increasingly operate under conditions of chronic instability rather than episodic crisis, raising urgent questions about how equality functions under permanent uncertainty. This study empirically tests the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF), which proposes that sustained instability normalizes crisis-oriented institutional logics, destabilizes equality processes, and produces stratified social outcomes through differential adaptive capacity and recursive trust dynamics. Using structural equation modeling (SEM) with a sample of 180 adults, we estimated direct, moderated, and recursive pathways among permanent uncertainty, crisis-oriented institutional logics, equality disruption, adaptive capacity, adaptive advantage, accumulated disadvantage, and institutional trust. Results indicate that permanent uncertainty strongly predicts crisis-oriented institutional logics (β = .59, p < .001), which in turn predict equality disruption (β = .55, p < .001). Equality disruption reduces adaptive advantage (β = −.46, p < .001) and increases accumulated disadvantage (β = .60, p < .001), producing structured divergence. Latent interaction effects demonstrate that adaptive capacity buffers, but does not eliminate, divergence pathways. Accumulated disadvantage erodes institutional trust, which recursively reinforces perceptions of permanent uncertainty. Model fit indices indicate excellent fit (CFI = .96, RMSEA = .05, SRMR = .04). These findings validate EDF as a mechanism-based explanation of how equality becomes destabilized under chronic instability and demonstrate that inequality and uncertainty operate as mutually reinforcing structural processes. Keywords: permanent uncertainty; equality disruption; crisis-oriented governance; adaptive capacity; accumulated disadvantage; institutional trust; social transformation; structural equation modeling. Title: Testing the Equality Disruption Framework (EDF): Permanent Uncertainty, Institutional Crisis Logics, and Stratified Social Outcomes Author: Dr. David Bull International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research ISSN 2348-3156 (Print), ISSN 2348-3164 (online) Vol. 14, Issue 1, January 2026 - March 2026 Page No: 144-166 Research Publish Journals Website: www.researchpublish.com Published Date: 23-February-2026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18744493 Paper Download Link (Source) https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/testing-the-equality-disruption-framework-edf-permanent-uncertainty-institutional-crisis-logics-and-stratified-social-outcomes

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.