Navigating Pressure: How FedOSC Builds Resilient Digital Curation for Open Science

Digital curation is being reshaped by a mix of accelerating AI uptake in research, public budget austerity, and a hardening political landscape. These forces intersect in ways that threatens the promises of open, equitable, sustainable and democratic research, paradoxically framing research data as both capital to protect and a public good to share This poster examines how FedOSC, Belgium’s Federal Open Science Cloud initiative aims to navigate these dynamics and strengthen resilient, democratic and transparent digital curation infrastructures. Austerity creates resource constraints that may reduce the capacity of the Federal Scientific Institutions (FSIs) to conduct high-quality data management, sustain research data or services, guarantee access or maintain long-term preservation. At the same time, AI offers efficiency through automated metadata management or linked data, yet inducing risks related to transparency, bias, externalization, and long-term maintenance. Patterns of digital authoritarianism, such as global north biases, or corporate monopolies, pose challenges to data sovereignty, archival integrity and equitable knowledge access. FedOSC proposes a strategic response to these points of pressure by enhancing or developing shared infrastructures and tools, aligning governance, policies and guidelines across FSIs. It promotes FAIR data practices, supports interoperable repository development, and provides training that emphasizes transparency, inclusivity, and accessibility. By coordinating efforts at a federal level and aligning with the European Science Cloud (EOSC), FedOSC reduces redundancy costs and strengthens resilience against technical, economic and political vulnerabilities. It commits federal research to the EOSC’s ambition of a truly functional open knowledge market in Europe and empowers FSIs to access EOSC services. Through equitable prioritization strategies, responsible AI integration, robust governance and shared infrastructure, FedOSC ensures that Open Sciences values remain intact even under pressures, guaranteeing access to scientific knowledge, reframing the apparent tension between Open Science and knowledge security as an opportunity for mutually reinforcing dissemination and preservation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18778104
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Pressure: How FedOSC Builds Resilient Digital Curation for Open Science

Judith Biernaux, Francis Strobbe, Marie-Sophie Bercegeay, Anna Miglio et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Research Data Management Practices
article

Navigating Pressure: How FedOSC Builds Resilient Digital Curation for Open Science

Judith Biernaux, Francis Strobbe, Marie-Sophie Bercegeay, Anna Miglio, Annerose Tartler
article en

Abstract

Digital curation is being reshaped by a mix of accelerating AI uptake in research, public budget austerity, and a hardening political landscape. These forces intersect in ways that threatens the promises of open, equitable, sustainable and democratic research, paradoxically framing research data as both capital to protect and a public good to share This poster examines how FedOSC, Belgium’s Federal Open Science Cloud initiative aims to navigate these dynamics and strengthen resilient, democratic and transparent digital curation infrastructures. Austerity creates resource constraints that may reduce the capacity of the Federal Scientific Institutions (FSIs) to conduct high-quality data management, sustain research data or services, guarantee access or maintain long-term preservation. At the same time, AI offers efficiency through automated metadata management or linked data, yet inducing risks related to transparency, bias, externalization, and long-term maintenance. Patterns of digital authoritarianism, such as global north biases, or corporate monopolies, pose challenges to data sovereignty, archival integrity and equitable knowledge access. FedOSC proposes a strategic response to these points of pressure by enhancing or developing shared infrastructures and tools, aligning governance, policies and guidelines across FSIs. It promotes FAIR data practices, supports interoperable repository development, and provides training that emphasizes transparency, inclusivity, and accessibility. By coordinating efforts at a federal level and aligning with the European Science Cloud (EOSC), FedOSC reduces redundancy costs and strengthens resilience against technical, economic and political vulnerabilities. It commits federal research to the EOSC’s ambition of a truly functional open knowledge market in Europe and empowers FSIs to access EOSC services. Through equitable prioritization strategies, responsible AI integration, robust governance and shared infrastructure, FedOSC ensures that Open Sciences values remain intact even under pressures, guaranteeing access to scientific knowledge, reframing the apparent tension between Open Science and knowledge security as an opportunity for mutually reinforcing dissemination and preservation strategies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Liège (BE), Royal Observatory of Belgium (BE), Royal Library of Belgium (BE), Foundation To Eradicate Duchenne (US), Institute of Natural Science (KP)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.