A systematic review of higher education-based interventions to support the mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students

Increasing numbers of neurodivergent students are engaging in higher education; however, support approaches vary within different institutions. Sometimes there are long waiting lists for specialised support, and most focus on academic adjustments, such as providing extra time in an assessment, rather than mental health and wellbeing. A systematic review, pre-registered on Prospero (CRD42024597980), was conducted to provide an overview of interventions supporting mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students in higher education. Ovid, Web of Science, and ERIC databases were searched in May 2025. Studies were included where the intervention aimed to improve mental health and/or wellbeing or improve the student experience, and the focus was on whether any strength-based approaches were used. Thirty-seven studies are included, conducted in seven countries. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included papers. Interventions varied widely and included: coaching, cognitive behavioural therapy, self-help, peer support, psychotherapy, counselling, mentoring, mindfulness, and neuro/bio feedback. The narrative synthesis demonstrates little evidence of strength-based approaches and found that neurodivergent students were rarely involved in designing the interventions. Most commonly, studies focused on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (17 studies) or Autism (14 studies), with few interventions considering co-occurrence or other neurotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Mental Health Research
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00196-4
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of higher education-based interventions to support the mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students

Nicola Byrom, Eleanor Jane Dommett, Faith Ross
npj Mental Health Research
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
article

A systematic review of higher education-based interventions to support the mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students

Nicola Byrom, Eleanor Jane Dommett, Faith Ross
article en

Abstract

Increasing numbers of neurodivergent students are engaging in higher education; however, support approaches vary within different institutions. Sometimes there are long waiting lists for specialised support, and most focus on academic adjustments, such as providing extra time in an assessment, rather than mental health and wellbeing. A systematic review, pre-registered on Prospero (CRD42024597980), was conducted to provide an overview of interventions supporting mental health and wellbeing of neurodivergent students in higher education. Ovid, Web of Science, and ERIC databases were searched in May 2025. Studies were included where the intervention aimed to improve mental health and/or wellbeing or improve the student experience, and the focus was on whether any strength-based approaches were used. Thirty-seven studies are included, conducted in seven countries. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included papers. Interventions varied widely and included: coaching, cognitive behavioural therapy, self-help, peer support, psychotherapy, counselling, mentoring, mindfulness, and neuro/bio feedback. The narrative synthesis demonstrates little evidence of strength-based approaches and found that neurodivergent students were rarely involved in designing the interventions. Most commonly, studies focused on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (17 studies) or Autism (14 studies), with few interventions considering co-occurrence or other neurotypes.

npj Mental Health ResearchVol. 5(1)
King's College London (GB), King's College School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.