Substantial international variation in the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review

Blood transfusion is one of the most common interventions in hospitals. Blood tests that support this widespread practice are considered routine, such as 'group and save' (also known as 'type and screen'), yet there has been very limited evaluation of the needs for these tests and the associated costs. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise international evidence on the costs of group and save and crossmatch tests and their component processes. Seventy-two studies published between 2012 and 2023 were identified and data were extracted. Most cost estimates were derived from local institutional sources with few using national reference data, and reporting methods varied widely. Median unit costs for group and save tests were £19.8 (interquartile range [IQR] £11.8-£52.5) overall, £13.8 in the United Kingdom and £57.4 in the United States. Crossmatch costs were £9.6 (IQR £5.9-£37.3). Understanding costs for group and save testing will inform hospital teams making decisions about sample requirements for procedures with a low likelihood of transfusion. It also provides benchmarking to assess the impact of implementing electronic systems to improve safety and efficiency of transfusion practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Haematology
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70370
Primary Topic
Blood transfusion and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Substantial international variation in the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review

Hayley G. Evans, Rafael Pinedo‐Villanueva, Gianluca Fabiano, Florian Tomini et al.
British Journal of Haematology
Blood transfusion and management
article

Substantial international variation in the cost of blood group and save and crossmatch: A systematic review

Hayley G. Evans, Rafael Pinedo‐Villanueva, Gianluca Fabiano, Florian Tomini, Paula Dhiman, Wei Shao Tung, Sophie Cole, A Palmer, Biruk Tsegaye, Mike Murphy, Isabel Singleton, Simon J Stanworth, Artin Manafi-Khosroshahi, Bilal Qureshi
article en

Abstract

Blood transfusion is one of the most common interventions in hospitals. Blood tests that support this widespread practice are considered routine, such as 'group and save' (also known as 'type and screen'), yet there has been very limited evaluation of the needs for these tests and the associated costs. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise international evidence on the costs of group and save and crossmatch tests and their component processes. Seventy-two studies published between 2012 and 2023 were identified and data were extracted. Most cost estimates were derived from local institutional sources with few using national reference data, and reporting methods varied widely. Median unit costs for group and save tests were £19.8 (interquartile range [IQR] £11.8-£52.5) overall, £13.8 in the United Kingdom and £57.4 in the United States. Crossmatch costs were £9.6 (IQR £5.9-£37.3). Understanding costs for group and save testing will inform hospital teams making decisions about sample requirements for procedures with a low likelihood of transfusion. It also provides benchmarking to assess the impact of implementing electronic systems to improve safety and efficiency of transfusion practice.

British Journal of Haematology
NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Science Oxford (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Blood transfusion and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.