To Collect or to Purchase? Collaboration Between Manufacturer and E-Commerce Platform on Customization

More manufacturers are combining novel customer-to-manufacturer (C2M) with traditional make-to-order (MTO) customization to deliver tailored products. However, they face a critical choice between collecting data independently and purchasing data-driven insights from e-commerce platforms. This key decision remains ambiguous in practice and understudied in the information systems literature, with little rigorous analysis on data acquisition ways and their interaction with hybrid customization. This study addresses this gap by investigating firms’ data acquisition strategies in the context of hybrid customization. We find that when the marginal cost of data acquisition is high for both the manufacturer and the e-commerce platform, and customers have a stronger bias against tailored products, the manufacturer should still prefer collecting market data independently rather than purchasing data-driven insights. The e-commerce platform should not always provide insight support. Moreover, manufacturer-collected C2M may sometimes lead to a higher effort level of acquiring informative data and more customer welfare than platform-initiated C2M. These results provide valuable guidelines to manufacturers on choosing an appropriate data acquisition way, to e-commerce platforms on offering data-driven insights, and to policymakers on improving customer welfare. These results also contribute to the emerging literature in IS and related disciplines on data-driven production models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Research
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2024.1266
Primary Topic
Product Development and Customization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Collect or to Purchase? Collaboration Between Manufacturer and E-Commerce Platform on Customization

Jun Pei, Savitri Kumar, Ping Yan
Information Systems Research
Product Development and Customization
article

To Collect or to Purchase? Collaboration Between Manufacturer and E-Commerce Platform on Customization

Jun Pei, Savitri Kumar, Ping Yan
article en

Abstract

More manufacturers are combining novel customer-to-manufacturer (C2M) with traditional make-to-order (MTO) customization to deliver tailored products. However, they face a critical choice between collecting data independently and purchasing data-driven insights from e-commerce platforms. This key decision remains ambiguous in practice and understudied in the information systems literature, with little rigorous analysis on data acquisition ways and their interaction with hybrid customization. This study addresses this gap by investigating firms’ data acquisition strategies in the context of hybrid customization. We find that when the marginal cost of data acquisition is high for both the manufacturer and the e-commerce platform, and customers have a stronger bias against tailored products, the manufacturer should still prefer collecting market data independently rather than purchasing data-driven insights. The e-commerce platform should not always provide insight support. Moreover, manufacturer-collected C2M may sometimes lead to a higher effort level of acquiring informative data and more customer welfare than platform-initiated C2M. These results provide valuable guidelines to manufacturers on choosing an appropriate data acquisition way, to e-commerce platforms on offering data-driven insights, and to policymakers on improving customer welfare. These results also contribute to the emerging literature in IS and related disciplines on data-driven production models.

Information Systems Research
Hefei University of Technology (CN), Hefei University (CN), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Product Development and Customization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.