Data-centric approach to uncover and mitigate representation bias in AI segmentation of esophageal tumors on CT

Accurate CT-based segmentation of primary esophageal tumors is critical for disease management. While AI models show promise for automated segmentation, the underrepresentation of certain subgroups may limit their robustness and generalizability. However, it remains unclear which factors contribute to reduced model effectiveness. In this retrospective study, segmentation models using nnU-Net were trained on baseline CT images. We systematically excluded tumors based on histological subtype and anatomical location to assess the impact on segmentation performance, measured by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and tumor detection rate. Additionally, we explored the effect of including intravenous contrast-enhanced scans in the training set. 275 patients were included: 71 from the Erasmus University Medical Center for training and internal testing, and 204 from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for external testing. Excluding squamous cell carcinoma tumors from the training set significantly reduced average DSC for these lesions on the external test set (p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d=0.79), while results for adenocarcinoma remained stable (p > 0.1; Cohen’s d=-0.03). Similarly, excluding mid and upper esophageal tumors decreased segmentation performance (p < 0.01; Cohen’s d=0.90 and 0.72 for the mid and upper ones). Finally, incorporating contrast-enhanced CT improved performance with a large effect size compared to a model trained only on non-contrast scans, with a mean DSC increase of 39% on contrast-enhanced images. Underrepresentation of histological subtypes, tumor locations, and imaging protocols in training data introduces representation bias that can considerably reduce segmentation performance. Expanding the training set to include these factors helps mitigate this bias and improves the robustness and generalizability of AI models. • Training data diversity strongly impacts esophageal tumor segmentation generalizability. • Underrepresentation of subgroups introduces representation bias and reduces AI model performance. • Including diverse tumor locations, histologies and imaging protocols improve model robustness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrai.2026.100082
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-centric approach to uncover and mitigate representation bias in AI segmentation of esophageal tumors on CT

Darren Cowzer, Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Sheldon Chen, Natalie Gangai et al.
European Journal of Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Data-centric approach to uncover and mitigate representation bias in AI segmentation of esophageal tumors on CT

Darren Cowzer, Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Sheldon Chen, Natalie Gangai, Viktoriya Paroder, Youssef Ghosn, Corentin Guérendel, Regina G.H. Beets-Tan, Stephan Ursprung, Bas P.L. Wijnhoven, Maria J. Valkema
article en

Abstract

Accurate CT-based segmentation of primary esophageal tumors is critical for disease management. While AI models show promise for automated segmentation, the underrepresentation of certain subgroups may limit their robustness and generalizability. However, it remains unclear which factors contribute to reduced model effectiveness. In this retrospective study, segmentation models using nnU-Net were trained on baseline CT images. We systematically excluded tumors based on histological subtype and anatomical location to assess the impact on segmentation performance, measured by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and tumor detection rate. Additionally, we explored the effect of including intravenous contrast-enhanced scans in the training set. 275 patients were included: 71 from the Erasmus University Medical Center for training and internal testing, and 204 from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for external testing. Excluding squamous cell carcinoma tumors from the training set significantly reduced average DSC for these lesions on the external test set (p < 0.0001; Cohen’s d=0.79), while results for adenocarcinoma remained stable (p > 0.1; Cohen’s d=-0.03). Similarly, excluding mid and upper esophageal tumors decreased segmentation performance (p < 0.01; Cohen’s d=0.90 and 0.72 for the mid and upper ones). Finally, incorporating contrast-enhanced CT improved performance with a large effect size compared to a model trained only on non-contrast scans, with a mean DSC increase of 39% on contrast-enhanced images. Underrepresentation of histological subtypes, tumor locations, and imaging protocols in training data introduces representation bias that can considerably reduce segmentation performance. Expanding the training set to include these factors helps mitigate this bias and improves the robustness and generalizability of AI models. • Training data diversity strongly impacts esophageal tumor segmentation generalizability. • Underrepresentation of subgroups introduces representation bias and reduces AI model performance. • Including diverse tumor locations, histologies and imaging protocols improve model robustness.

European Journal of Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Universiteit Maastricht
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.