A cross-sectional survey of false beliefs about COVID-19 and their association with vaccine hesitancy and uptake in the United States and China

Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines fuel vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The prevalence of false beliefs contributes to differences in vaccine hesitancy across the US and China. We present cross sectional research assessing false beliefs about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine, and both vaccine/booster status and hesitancy in the US and China. We compared these variables across US (n = 454) and Chinese (n = 456) participants. Additionally, we use regression analyses to assess the relative association between false beliefs about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine/booster hesitancy and uptake. The likelihood of receiving an initial vaccine was greater in China than the US (OR = 346.50, p < 0.001), and false beliefs about COVID-19 were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving an initial vaccine (OR = 0.82, p = 0.05). The likelihood of receiving booster was just over three times greater in China than the US (OR = 3.45, p < 0.001) and false beliefs about COVID-19 were not associated with the likelihood of receiving a booster (OR = 0.92, p = 0.33). Vaccine hesitancy is more likely in the US than China (eB = 0.85, p < 0.001) and false beliefs about COVID-19 are positively associated with vaccine hesitancy (eB = 1.20, p < 0.01). There was significant interaction between country and false beliefs (eB = 0.93, p = 0.02). Booster hesitancy is more likely in the US than China (eB = 0.95, p = 0.04) and false beliefs about COVID-19 are positively associated with booster hesitancy (eB = 1.15, p < 0.001). False beliefs about COVID-19 were associated with attitudes (vaccine hesitancy) but not behaviors (vaccine status). Additionally, we found that the strength of the association between false beliefs and attitudes differed between the two countries. Trusted resources to combat false beliefs, that are tailored to the local context, could help reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005939
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-sectional survey of false beliefs about COVID-19 and their association with vaccine hesitancy and uptake in the United States and China

Rachel E. Dinero, Trijya Singh, Brittany Kmush, Mathlide Hou et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

A cross-sectional survey of false beliefs about COVID-19 and their association with vaccine hesitancy and uptake in the United States and China

Rachel E. Dinero, Trijya Singh, Brittany Kmush, Mathlide Hou, Rong Chen
article en

Abstract

Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines fuel vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The prevalence of false beliefs contributes to differences in vaccine hesitancy across the US and China. We present cross sectional research assessing false beliefs about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine, and both vaccine/booster status and hesitancy in the US and China. We compared these variables across US (n = 454) and Chinese (n = 456) participants. Additionally, we use regression analyses to assess the relative association between false beliefs about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccine and vaccine/booster hesitancy and uptake. The likelihood of receiving an initial vaccine was greater in China than the US (OR = 346.50, p < 0.001), and false beliefs about COVID-19 were associated with a decreased likelihood of receiving an initial vaccine (OR = 0.82, p = 0.05). The likelihood of receiving booster was just over three times greater in China than the US (OR = 3.45, p < 0.001) and false beliefs about COVID-19 were not associated with the likelihood of receiving a booster (OR = 0.92, p = 0.33). Vaccine hesitancy is more likely in the US than China (eB = 0.85, p < 0.001) and false beliefs about COVID-19 are positively associated with vaccine hesitancy (eB = 1.20, p < 0.01). There was significant interaction between country and false beliefs (eB = 0.93, p = 0.02). Booster hesitancy is more likely in the US than China (eB = 0.95, p = 0.04) and false beliefs about COVID-19 are positively associated with booster hesitancy (eB = 1.15, p < 0.001). False beliefs about COVID-19 were associated with attitudes (vaccine hesitancy) but not behaviors (vaccine status). Additionally, we found that the strength of the association between false beliefs and attitudes differed between the two countries. Trusted resources to combat false beliefs, that are tailored to the local context, could help reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(2)
Dominican University of California (US), Colgate University (US), Le Moyne College (US), Syracuse University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.