Barriers and opportunities to preventing residential bird–window collisions

Collisions with windows are a leading source of avian mortality in North America. Window treatment options are commercially available; however, these solutions are rarely used. To investigate knowledge and perceptions of bird-window collisions, willingness to treat windows, and barriers and solutions to treating windows we conducted a survey of residents in Ottawa, Canada. Of 422 survey respondents, 90.7% had previously heard of bird-window collisions, 58.5% had previously observed a collision, 88.0% consider collisions with windows to be an issue in Ottawa, and 87.0% were willing to treat their windows. For all survey respondents, the top barriers reducing willingness to treat windows included the perception that birds infrequently or never collide with windows, aesthetics, and wanting a clear view from windows. For those willing to treat their windows, lack of time was the most identified barrier (38.2%), while for those unwilling to treat their windows, the need for more evidence that bird-window collisions require action was most identified (49.1%). Top potential solutions were provision of free materials, aesthetically pleasing materials, and clear instructions. Our results suggest that Ottawa residents are generally willing to treat their windows at home and we identify key barriers between willingness and implementation. To encourage bird-friendly window treatment at a wider scale, we suggest targeted messaging highlighting the impact of low-rise housing in driving the problem and the solution to bird-window collisions. Our results also highlight the opportunity for advocacy groups to aid residents in overcoming practical barriers to treating their windows.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342330
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and opportunities to preventing residential bird–window collisions

PLoS ONE
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Barriers and opportunities to preventing residential bird–window collisions

article en

Abstract

Collisions with windows are a leading source of avian mortality in North America. Window treatment options are commercially available; however, these solutions are rarely used. To investigate knowledge and perceptions of bird-window collisions, willingness to treat windows, and barriers and solutions to treating windows we conducted a survey of residents in Ottawa, Canada. Of 422 survey respondents, 90.7% had previously heard of bird-window collisions, 58.5% had previously observed a collision, 88.0% consider collisions with windows to be an issue in Ottawa, and 87.0% were willing to treat their windows. For all survey respondents, the top barriers reducing willingness to treat windows included the perception that birds infrequently or never collide with windows, aesthetics, and wanting a clear view from windows. For those willing to treat their windows, lack of time was the most identified barrier (38.2%), while for those unwilling to treat their windows, the need for more evidence that bird-window collisions require action was most identified (49.1%). Top potential solutions were provision of free materials, aesthetically pleasing materials, and clear instructions. Our results suggest that Ottawa residents are generally willing to treat their windows at home and we identify key barriers between willingness and implementation. To encourage bird-friendly window treatment at a wider scale, we suggest targeted messaging highlighting the impact of low-rise housing in driving the problem and the solution to bird-window collisions. Our results also highlight the opportunity for advocacy groups to aid residents in overcoming practical barriers to treating their windows.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Carleton University (CA)
Molson Foundation, Environment and Climate Change Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.