Myocardial Layer‐Specific Longitudinal Strain for Identification of the Culprit Vessel in Elderly Patients With NSTE‐ACS

Volume regulation graph (VRG) for 3 data sets (squares) referring to different degrees of coronary stenosis. Associated averaged data for patient cohorts are identified and presented: no significant stenosis, significant stenosis and occlusion. The corresponding data for group average end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) are shown, and they appear in ascending order. As average ESV and EDV seem to increase in a pari passu fashion (green line and regression equation), their ratio (reflected by ejection fraction, EF) does not appreciably vary. Maximum EF is indicated by the red line, and minimum EF by the blue line, without significant difference. Based on published data. Also presented are average data for various other studies that employ territorial longitudinal strain (TLS) to detect a culprit vessel. Inset (green color): survey of various metrics used to evaluate severity of a coronary stenosis or detection of culprit vessel, including percentage arterial diameter reduction (% D), left ventricular EF (LVEF), fractional flow reserve (FFR), global longitudinal strain (GLS), TLS, and wall motion score index (WMSI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Echocardiography
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.70412
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Myocardial Layer‐Specific Longitudinal Strain for Identification of the Culprit Vessel in Elderly Patients With NSTE‐ACS

Peter L. M. Kerkhof, Guy R Heyndrickx
Echocardiography
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Myocardial Layer‐Specific Longitudinal Strain for Identification of the Culprit Vessel in Elderly Patients With NSTE‐ACS

Peter L. M. Kerkhof, Guy R Heyndrickx
article en

Abstract

Volume regulation graph (VRG) for 3 data sets (squares) referring to different degrees of coronary stenosis. Associated averaged data for patient cohorts are identified and presented: no significant stenosis, significant stenosis and occlusion. The corresponding data for group average end-systolic volume (ESV) and end-diastolic volume (EDV) are shown, and they appear in ascending order. As average ESV and EDV seem to increase in a pari passu fashion (green line and regression equation), their ratio (reflected by ejection fraction, EF) does not appreciably vary. Maximum EF is indicated by the red line, and minimum EF by the blue line, without significant difference. Based on published data. Also presented are average data for various other studies that employ territorial longitudinal strain (TLS) to detect a culprit vessel. Inset (green color): survey of various metrics used to evaluate severity of a coronary stenosis or detection of culprit vessel, including percentage arterial diameter reduction (% D), left ventricular EF (LVEF), fractional flow reserve (FFR), global longitudinal strain (GLS), TLS, and wall motion score index (WMSI).

EchocardiographyVol. 43(3)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.