Comparison of outcomes between thoracostomy and non-thoracostomy management in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center (2018–2021)

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare yet critical congenital anomaly requiring prompt surgical intervention. The necessity of routine chest tube placement during EA repair remains controversial, particularly in neonates vulnerable to procedure-related complications. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with thoracostomy versus non-thoracostomy management in neonates undergoing EA repair. In this retrospective descriptive-analytical study, 79 neonates treated for EA at Shahid Motahari Pediatric Hospital (Urmia, Iran) between 2018 and 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into thoracostomy (n = 27) and non-thoracostomy (n = 52) groups. Data on demographics, ventilation duration, NICU stay, postoperative pneumonia, pneumothorax, and mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The thoracostomy group exhibited significantly longer NICU stays [median (IQR) 20 (12–31) vs. 13 (9–20) days; p = 0.022] and higher pneumothorax incidence (40.7% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001). Mechanical ventilation duration showed a non-significant trend toward longer duration in the thoracostomy group [median (IQR) 6 (4–12) vs. 4 (2–8) days; p = 0.053]. No significant differences were observed in pneumonia rates (11.1% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.947) or mortality (22.2% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.508). Multivariate logistic regression identified thoracostomy as a strong independent predictor of pneumothorax (adjusted OR = 22.56; 95% CI: 4.19-121.39; p < 0.001), with no significant association with pneumonia or mortality. Routine chest tube placement in neonatal EA repair was associated with increased morbidity, particularly higher pneumothorax risk and prolonged NICU stay, without benefits in preventing pneumonia or reducing mortality. These findings argue against routine use and support a selective, individualized approach. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for thoracostomy in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-03904-5
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of outcomes between thoracostomy and non-thoracostomy management in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center (2018–2021)

Rahman Khosravi, Hatef Alizadeh, Hossein Khosravi
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Comparison of outcomes between thoracostomy and non-thoracostomy management in patients undergoing esophageal atresia surgery: a retrospective study in a tertiary care center (2018–2021)

Rahman Khosravi, Hatef Alizadeh, Hossein Khosravi
article en

Abstract

Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare yet critical congenital anomaly requiring prompt surgical intervention. The necessity of routine chest tube placement during EA repair remains controversial, particularly in neonates vulnerable to procedure-related complications. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with thoracostomy versus non-thoracostomy management in neonates undergoing EA repair. In this retrospective descriptive-analytical study, 79 neonates treated for EA at Shahid Motahari Pediatric Hospital (Urmia, Iran) between 2018 and 2021 were included. Patients were categorized into thoracostomy (n = 27) and non-thoracostomy (n = 52) groups. Data on demographics, ventilation duration, NICU stay, postoperative pneumonia, pneumothorax, and mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The thoracostomy group exhibited significantly longer NICU stays [median (IQR) 20 (12–31) vs. 13 (9–20) days; p = 0.022] and higher pneumothorax incidence (40.7% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001). Mechanical ventilation duration showed a non-significant trend toward longer duration in the thoracostomy group [median (IQR) 6 (4–12) vs. 4 (2–8) days; p = 0.053]. No significant differences were observed in pneumonia rates (11.1% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.947) or mortality (22.2% vs. 25.0%; p = 0.508). Multivariate logistic regression identified thoracostomy as a strong independent predictor of pneumothorax (adjusted OR = 22.56; 95% CI: 4.19-121.39; p < 0.001), with no significant association with pneumonia or mortality. Routine chest tube placement in neonatal EA repair was associated with increased morbidity, particularly higher pneumothorax risk and prolonged NICU stay, without benefits in preventing pneumonia or reducing mortality. These findings argue against routine use and support a selective, individualized approach. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for thoracostomy in this high-risk population.

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Urmia University of Technology (IR), Urmia University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.