Characteristics of Particles from Different Household Cooking Activities

Household cooking is a dominant source of indoor aerosols and an important contributor to human exposure, yet systematic comparisons among commonly used cooking methods remain limited. Here, we investigated emissions from a pan, an air fryer, and an oven under controlled residential conditions with constant chicken quantity and varying oil quantity and marination. The pan generated the highest PM2.5 concentrations and mass-based emission rates, whereas the air fryer emitted moderate levels and the oven had minimal emissions. Variations in PM2.5 mass concentration are tightly associated with the size distribution of emitted particles, with diameter (dp) peaking at 120–140 nm, 55–62 nm, and 20–30 nm from the pan, air fryer, and oven, respectively. Oil quantity and marination substantially affected mass-based emissions, whereas number concentrations were not substantially influenced. Organic compounds dominated the aerosols, and spectral marker ratios (f55/f57, f67/f69) clearly differentiated them from ambient aerosols. Based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model with particle hygroscopic growth, the air fryer produced the highest particle number dose, while pan frying generated the largest mass and surface area dose, with over 50% depositing in the alveolar region. These findings demonstrate that cooking method is a critical determinant of indoor particle exposure and that different cooking methods present distinct exposure profiles depending on the metric considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Air
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00450
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics of Particles from Different Household Cooking Activities

Yiqun Lu, Yueru Jiang, Ximeng Qi, Jiamin Ma et al.
ACS ES&T Air
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Characteristics of Particles from Different Household Cooking Activities

Yiqun Lu, Yueru Jiang, Ximeng Qi, Jiamin Ma, Tengyu Liu, Xuguang Chi, Qiaozhi Zha, Wei Nie, Aijun Ding, Chang Zhou, Dafeng Ge, Juan Hong, Chao Yan, Liangduo Chen, Ziheng Chen
article en

Abstract

Household cooking is a dominant source of indoor aerosols and an important contributor to human exposure, yet systematic comparisons among commonly used cooking methods remain limited. Here, we investigated emissions from a pan, an air fryer, and an oven under controlled residential conditions with constant chicken quantity and varying oil quantity and marination. The pan generated the highest PM2.5 concentrations and mass-based emission rates, whereas the air fryer emitted moderate levels and the oven had minimal emissions. Variations in PM2.5 mass concentration are tightly associated with the size distribution of emitted particles, with diameter (dp) peaking at 120–140 nm, 55–62 nm, and 20–30 nm from the pan, air fryer, and oven, respectively. Oil quantity and marination substantially affected mass-based emissions, whereas number concentrations were not substantially influenced. Organic compounds dominated the aerosols, and spectral marker ratios (f55/f57, f67/f69) clearly differentiated them from ambient aerosols. Based on the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) model with particle hygroscopic growth, the air fryer produced the highest particle number dose, while pan frying generated the largest mass and surface area dose, with over 50% depositing in the alveolar region. These findings demonstrate that cooking method is a critical determinant of indoor particle exposure and that different cooking methods present distinct exposure profiles depending on the metric considered.

ACS ES&T AirVol. 3(3)
Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (China) (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.