Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Cost‐Effectiveness in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma in Lower Austria (2018–2022)

Modern therapies for r/r DLBCL have significantly improved survival rates, but their high costs necessitate careful cost-effectiveness assessments to ensure they are integrated optimally into clinical practice. Additionally, our findings indicate that calendar-based comparisons can be misleading, since novel treatments do not simply "start" and "stop" at approval dates-a crucial methodological insight that is highly generalizable to real-world evidence studies. Grouping patients by actual therapy exposure offers a more accurate evaluation of clinical benefits and economic impact when new treatments become routine. Achieving equitable access to treatment while maintaining healthcare sustainability will require coordinated efforts among clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71667
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Cost‐Effectiveness in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma in Lower Austria (2018–2022)

Sandra Gottsauner-Wolf, Doris A. Behrens, Josef Singer
Cancer Medicine
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Cost‐Effectiveness in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma in Lower Austria (2018–2022)

Sandra Gottsauner-Wolf, Doris A. Behrens, Josef Singer
article en

Abstract

Modern therapies for r/r DLBCL have significantly improved survival rates, but their high costs necessitate careful cost-effectiveness assessments to ensure they are integrated optimally into clinical practice. Additionally, our findings indicate that calendar-based comparisons can be misleading, since novel treatments do not simply "start" and "stop" at approval dates-a crucial methodological insight that is highly generalizable to real-world evidence studies. Grouping patients by actual therapy exposure offers a more accurate evaluation of clinical benefits and economic impact when new treatments become routine. Achieving equitable access to treatment while maintaining healthcare sustainability will require coordinated efforts among clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(3)
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB), Government of Lower Austria (AT), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT), Cardiff University (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.