Identifying main shock–aftershock sequences on the Longmen Shan Fault: comparison between two cluster analysis techniques

SUMMARY The Sichuan Basin in China has experienced a number of devastating earthquakes in the past 20 yr, particularly on the Longmen Shan fault (LMSFZ) with the 2008 Wenchan and 2013 Luschan events. This study employs a hierarchical, four-dimensional (latitude, longitude, depth, time) clustering framework to characterize seismic activity in the Sichuan Basin. After the identification of spatial features of the region (e.g. faults), we then apply two cluster algorithms on the Longmen Shan fault data and compare the identification of the 2008 and 2013 events. In particular, we apply and compare density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model (BGMM) on the identification of main shock–aftershock sequence (as well as any foreshock events). By applying temporal clustering to the data set and comparing DBSCAN and BGMM methods, we find distinct differences between the results. Specifically, we find that DBSCAN identifies a simple main shock–aftershock sequence, while BGMM produces a more complex foreshock–main shock–aftershock sequence. However, both scenarios have been identified within previous work on these events, highlighting that additional analysis is required and that single cluster algorithms should be applied with caution. The work here in comparing machine learning techniques within an integrated clustering framework is timely and will serve as a guide for more in-depth analysis on earthquake patterns and fault dynamics using these methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggag081
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying main shock–aftershock sequences on the Longmen Shan Fault: comparison between two cluster analysis techniques

Philip J. Heron, Congyi Wan
Geophysical Journal International
earthquake and tectonic studies
article

Identifying main shock–aftershock sequences on the Longmen Shan Fault: comparison between two cluster analysis techniques

Philip J. Heron, Congyi Wan
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY The Sichuan Basin in China has experienced a number of devastating earthquakes in the past 20 yr, particularly on the Longmen Shan fault (LMSFZ) with the 2008 Wenchan and 2013 Luschan events. This study employs a hierarchical, four-dimensional (latitude, longitude, depth, time) clustering framework to characterize seismic activity in the Sichuan Basin. After the identification of spatial features of the region (e.g. faults), we then apply two cluster algorithms on the Longmen Shan fault data and compare the identification of the 2008 and 2013 events. In particular, we apply and compare density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model (BGMM) on the identification of main shock–aftershock sequence (as well as any foreshock events). By applying temporal clustering to the data set and comparing DBSCAN and BGMM methods, we find distinct differences between the results. Specifically, we find that DBSCAN identifies a simple main shock–aftershock sequence, while BGMM produces a more complex foreshock–main shock–aftershock sequence. However, both scenarios have been identified within previous work on these events, highlighting that additional analysis is required and that single cluster algorithms should be applied with caution. The work here in comparing machine learning techniques within an integrated clustering framework is timely and will serve as a guide for more in-depth analysis on earthquake patterns and fault dynamics using these methods.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 245(2)
Scarborough Health Network (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
earthquake and tectonic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.