Comparing Diabetes Mellitus Mortality Estimates from CDC WONDER Death Certificate Data and Global Burden of Disease Study Data in the United States

Background: Data on mortality from Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in the United States (US) are available from various sources, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) death certificate data and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). This study aimed to compare DM mortality reporting between the CDC WONDER and GBD datasets. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we calculated the absolute number of deaths and crude mortality rates attributed to DM as the underlying cause of death in CDC WONDER and GBD in the US from 1999 to 2021 (CMR with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) or Uncertainty Intervals (UI)) per 100000 population. Because of methodological differences between datasets, results were also evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion of mortality from DM with renal complications. Results: The reported CMR for DM increased from 34 (95% CI: 34 to 35) to 41 (95% CI: 41to 42) in CDC WONDER but decreased from 36 (95% UI: 32 to 37) to 29 (95% UI: 27 to 31) in GBD from 1999 to 2021. When deaths from DM with renal complications were excluded from CDC WONDER to mirror GBD reporting, CMRs in 1999 and 2021 from CDC WONDER were 33 (95% CI: 33 to 34) and 29 (95% CI: 28 to 29), respectively, and trends were generally similar. Conclusion: Estimates of DM mortality rates and temporal trends in the US vary across commonly utilized sources of mortality data. These results have important implications for epidemiological efforts to understand and interpret DM mortality reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Health Sciences
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/jrhs.12781
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Diabetes Mellitus Mortality Estimates from CDC WONDER Death Certificate Data and Global Burden of Disease Study Data in the United States

Dmitry Abramov, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Salim S. Virani, Harriette GC Van Spall
Journal of Research in Health Sciences
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Comparing Diabetes Mellitus Mortality Estimates from CDC WONDER Death Certificate Data and Global Burden of Disease Study Data in the United States

Dmitry Abramov, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas, Salim S. Virani, Harriette GC Van Spall
article en

Abstract

Background: Data on mortality from Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in the United States (US) are available from various sources, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) death certificate data and the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). This study aimed to compare DM mortality reporting between the CDC WONDER and GBD datasets. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we calculated the absolute number of deaths and crude mortality rates attributed to DM as the underlying cause of death in CDC WONDER and GBD in the US from 1999 to 2021 (CMR with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) or Uncertainty Intervals (UI)) per 100000 population. Because of methodological differences between datasets, results were also evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion of mortality from DM with renal complications. Results: The reported CMR for DM increased from 34 (95% CI: 34 to 35) to 41 (95% CI: 41to 42) in CDC WONDER but decreased from 36 (95% UI: 32 to 37) to 29 (95% UI: 27 to 31) in GBD from 1999 to 2021. When deaths from DM with renal complications were excluded from CDC WONDER to mirror GBD reporting, CMRs in 1999 and 2021 from CDC WONDER were 33 (95% CI: 33 to 34) and 29 (95% CI: 28 to 29), respectively, and trends were generally similar. Conclusion: Estimates of DM mortality rates and temporal trends in the US vary across commonly utilized sources of mortality data. These results have important implications for epidemiological efforts to understand and interpret DM mortality reporting.

Journal of Research in Health SciencesVol. 26(2)
Aga Khan University (PK), Loma Linda University Medical Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Loma Linda University (US), Population Health Research Institute (CA), Aga Khan University Nairobi (KE), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.