Conscious Geometry Theory and the Unsolved Problems of Science and Mathematics: A Systematic Assessment

Systematic examination of every major unsolved problem in mathematics and science through the lens of Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT). For each problem: what CGT already provides, what direction CGT indicates, what would constitute a genuine contribution versus a speculative analogy, and what work remains. Problems are ranked into three tiers: Tier 1 — Direct Engagement (12 problems where CGT has existing mathematical machinery, including Yang-Mills mass gap, turbulence, hierarchy problem, and consciousness hard problem); Tier 2 — Indicated Direction (11 problems where CGT's framework points toward an approach but significant work remains); Tier 3 — Suggestive Connections (6 problems where the connection is currently weak). Includes honest assessment of which connections are genuine versus aspirational.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18772501
Primary Topic
Science and Climate Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conscious Geometry Theory and the Unsolved Problems of Science and Mathematics: A Systematic Assessment

Phileas Foxx
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Science and Climate Studies
article

Conscious Geometry Theory and the Unsolved Problems of Science and Mathematics: A Systematic Assessment

Phileas Foxx
article en

Abstract

Systematic examination of every major unsolved problem in mathematics and science through the lens of Conscious Geometry Theory (CGT). For each problem: what CGT already provides, what direction CGT indicates, what would constitute a genuine contribution versus a speculative analogy, and what work remains. Problems are ranked into three tiers: Tier 1 — Direct Engagement (12 problems where CGT has existing mathematical machinery, including Yang-Mills mass gap, turbulence, hierarchy problem, and consciousness hard problem); Tier 2 — Indicated Direction (11 problems where CGT's framework points toward an approach but significant work remains); Tier 3 — Suggestive Connections (6 problems where the connection is currently weak). Includes honest assessment of which connections are genuine versus aspirational.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Science and Climate Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.