Methods for analysing wildlife DNA methylation data

The analysis of DNA methylation data for wildlife conservation is gaining momentum as the technology for quantifying the methylome becomes mainstream. The use of epigenetic information extracted from tissue samples can be used for estimating chronological age, individual traits and phenotypic variation. Methylation data present an exciting opportunity to study wildlife populations, with the potential to provide insights into age structure, vital rates and health. However, the statistical methodology for answering the emerging research questions has been developed and mostly applied in the human biomedical setting. We review the key methodologies commonly used in wildlife settings, and methods that have been used only in human studies so far that could improve our understanding of wildlife epigenomic changes. We show how the different methods relate to each other and how they link to research questions, illustrating each approach with data from a case study, a large dataset from wild bottlenose dolphins (<i>Tursiops</i> spp.) from the US southeast and Gulf coast. Estimating chronological age from models called epigenetic clocks and understanding the relationship between epigenetic indicators of health and exposure to stressors are both key goals in wildlife settings; however, we show that a single model cannot do both accurately. This is a fundamental limitation of clock-type models and might explain why some age-related health conditions have been found to be related to epigenetic age and others not. Decoupling the analysis of age and health is challenging because the two are confounded but is especially important in wildlife settings where age prediction is often the main analytical objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Physiology
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaf091
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for analysing wildlife DNA methylation data

Theoni Photopoulou, Catriona M. Harris, Ryan Takeshita, Peter L. Tyack et al.
Conservation Physiology
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
article

Methods for analysing wildlife DNA methylation data

Theoni Photopoulou, Catriona M. Harris, Ryan Takeshita, Peter L. Tyack, Len Thomas, Ian Durbach, Gina K. Himes Boor, Ashley Barratclough, Enrico Pirotta, Lori H. Schwacke
article en

Abstract

The analysis of DNA methylation data for wildlife conservation is gaining momentum as the technology for quantifying the methylome becomes mainstream. The use of epigenetic information extracted from tissue samples can be used for estimating chronological age, individual traits and phenotypic variation. Methylation data present an exciting opportunity to study wildlife populations, with the potential to provide insights into age structure, vital rates and health. However, the statistical methodology for answering the emerging research questions has been developed and mostly applied in the human biomedical setting. We review the key methodologies commonly used in wildlife settings, and methods that have been used only in human studies so far that could improve our understanding of wildlife epigenomic changes. We show how the different methods relate to each other and how they link to research questions, illustrating each approach with data from a case study, a large dataset from wild bottlenose dolphins (<i>Tursiops</i> spp.) from the US southeast and Gulf coast. Estimating chronological age from models called epigenetic clocks and understanding the relationship between epigenetic indicators of health and exposure to stressors are both key goals in wildlife settings; however, we show that a single model cannot do both accurately. This is a fundamental limitation of clock-type models and might explain why some age-related health conditions have been found to be related to epigenetic age and others not. Decoupling the analysis of age and health is challenging because the two are confounded but is especially important in wildlife settings where age prediction is often the main analytical objective.

Conservation PhysiologyVol. 14(1)
University of Cape Town (ZA), University of St Andrews (GB), National Marine Mammal Foundation (US), Marine Mammal Commission (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.