Cold snare polypectomy for 10–19 mm colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

<b>Background and aims:</b> Evidence for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CSP <i>vs.</i> hot snare polypectomy (HSP). <b>Methods:</b> This prospective non-inferiority randomized controlled trial predefined a non-inferiority margin of 4%. A total of 452 colorectal adenomas (10-19 mm) from 41 FAP patients were enrolled between May 2024 and May 2025 and randomized 1:1 to CSP (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 220) or HSP (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 232). The primary endpoint was histological complete resection (R0). Subgroup analyses were performed by lesion size (10-15 mm <i>vs</i>. 16-19 mm). <b>Results:</b> R0 resection rates were similar between CSP and HSP (92.3% <i>vs</i>. 92.7%, <i>p =</i> 0.76). CSP was associated with shorter procedure time (4.53 ± 1.18 <i>vs</i>. 6.53 ± 1.46 min, <i>p <</i> 0.01) and lower hospitalization costs (<i>p <</i> 0.01). Intra-procedural bleeding was more frequent with CSP, whereas delayed bleeding and post-polypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome were more common with HSP. At 6 months, recurrence was rare (one lesion in each group). No significant interaction by lesion size was observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> CSP is non-inferior to HSP for R0 resection of 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in FAP patients and offers advantages in efficiency, safety and cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2026.2632065
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cold snare polypectomy for 10–19 mm colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

S H Chen, Zhilin Liu, Linfu Zheng, B. Xu et al.
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Cold snare polypectomy for 10–19 mm colorectal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

S H Chen, Zhilin Liu, Linfu Zheng, B. Xu, Ye Zhou, Xingjie Gao, Dazhou Li, Wen Wang, Kun Lin
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and aims:</b> Evidence for cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in treating 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of CSP <i>vs.</i> hot snare polypectomy (HSP). <b>Methods:</b> This prospective non-inferiority randomized controlled trial predefined a non-inferiority margin of 4%. A total of 452 colorectal adenomas (10-19 mm) from 41 FAP patients were enrolled between May 2024 and May 2025 and randomized 1:1 to CSP (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 220) or HSP (<i>n</i> <i>=</i> 232). The primary endpoint was histological complete resection (R0). Subgroup analyses were performed by lesion size (10-15 mm <i>vs</i>. 16-19 mm). <b>Results:</b> R0 resection rates were similar between CSP and HSP (92.3% <i>vs</i>. 92.7%, <i>p =</i> 0.76). CSP was associated with shorter procedure time (4.53 ± 1.18 <i>vs</i>. 6.53 ± 1.46 min, <i>p <</i> 0.01) and lower hospitalization costs (<i>p <</i> 0.01). Intra-procedural bleeding was more frequent with CSP, whereas delayed bleeding and post-polypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome were more common with HSP. At 6 months, recurrence was rare (one lesion in each group). No significant interaction by lesion size was observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> CSP is non-inferior to HSP for R0 resection of 10-19 mm colorectal adenomas in FAP patients and offers advantages in efficiency, safety and cost.

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Fujian Medical University (CN), People's Liberation Army 401 Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.