Editorial: Methods to modulate sleep with neurotechnology, devices, or wearables

electrical, magnetic, thermal, or ultrasound-based stimulation. This review also outlines persistent engineering challenges: the importance of precise timing of stimuli, refractory periods that limit the number of effective stimuli, and the need for individualized, state-aware calibration to prevent 7 . Their findings underscore the importance of scalable, generalizable machine-learning models for enabling wearable devices to monitor brain states with sufficient precision for neurostimulation. However, meta-analytic approaches highlight uncertainty across biofeedback studies, as illustrated by the systematic review and meta-analysis provided by, Recio-Rodriguez et al 12 .evaluating neurofeedback interventions for insomnia. Curiously, across randomized controlled trials, 'surface neurofeedback' (based on real time EEG data), showed an overall effect which favored improvements in sleep quality (PSQI scores) in control conditions over-active conditions, whereas insomnia symptom severity showed no significant change. This contribution is an important reminder that methodological rigor, including placebo controls and standardized protocol, remains essential. Recio-Rodriguez 12 This topic highlights a departure from devices that target one sensory channel (namely auditory stimulation) toward integrated multi-modal approaches such as skin-temperature feedback and tactile stimulation. Future work demonstrating a combination of approaches is warranted.Proprietary, 'black box' sleep devices limit scientific replication and slow innovation. The field must move toward open-source hardware, transparent stimulation algorithms, and modifiable realtime decoding pipelines that researchers can inspect, validate, and refine. Such openness enables reproducibility, accelerates methodological improvements, and supports interoperable systems that can drive genuine advances in sleep neurotechnology.Taken together, the studies presented in this Research Topic demonstrate how neurotechnology, wearable systems, and computational methods are reshaping both the scientific understanding of sleep and the practical tools available to treat sleep disturbances. By integrating physiological precision, user-centered design, and open scientific frameworks, these approaches hold substantial promise for advancing sleep health across diverse populations, when applied correctly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1792469
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial: Methods to modulate sleep with neurotechnology, devices, or wearables

M. Carrington Reid, William G. Coon, Michael T. Smith
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

Editorial: Methods to modulate sleep with neurotechnology, devices, or wearables

M. Carrington Reid, William G. Coon, Michael T. Smith
article en

Abstract

electrical, magnetic, thermal, or ultrasound-based stimulation. This review also outlines persistent engineering challenges: the importance of precise timing of stimuli, refractory periods that limit the number of effective stimuli, and the need for individualized, state-aware calibration to prevent 7 . Their findings underscore the importance of scalable, generalizable machine-learning models for enabling wearable devices to monitor brain states with sufficient precision for neurostimulation. However, meta-analytic approaches highlight uncertainty across biofeedback studies, as illustrated by the systematic review and meta-analysis provided by, Recio-Rodriguez et al 12 .evaluating neurofeedback interventions for insomnia. Curiously, across randomized controlled trials, 'surface neurofeedback' (based on real time EEG data), showed an overall effect which favored improvements in sleep quality (PSQI scores) in control conditions over-active conditions, whereas insomnia symptom severity showed no significant change. This contribution is an important reminder that methodological rigor, including placebo controls and standardized protocol, remains essential. Recio-Rodriguez 12 This topic highlights a departure from devices that target one sensory channel (namely auditory stimulation) toward integrated multi-modal approaches such as skin-temperature feedback and tactile stimulation. Future work demonstrating a combination of approaches is warranted.Proprietary, 'black box' sleep devices limit scientific replication and slow innovation. The field must move toward open-source hardware, transparent stimulation algorithms, and modifiable realtime decoding pipelines that researchers can inspect, validate, and refine. Such openness enables reproducibility, accelerates methodological improvements, and supports interoperable systems that can drive genuine advances in sleep neurotechnology.Taken together, the studies presented in this Research Topic demonstrate how neurotechnology, wearable systems, and computational methods are reshaping both the scientific understanding of sleep and the practical tools available to treat sleep disturbances. By integrating physiological precision, user-centered design, and open scientific frameworks, these approaches hold substantial promise for advancing sleep health across diverse populations, when applied correctly.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 20
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.