A comparative analysis of generative AI adoption among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom: a UTAUT perspective

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the design industry, offering new capabilities to enhance creativity and streamline design processes. However, there is still limited understanding of how design professionals in different countries and technological environments view and use these tools, especially given the uneven global development of GenAI. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework (UTAUT), this study aims to investigate the factors that influence the adoption of GenAI tools among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom (UK). Overall, 607 responses (233 from China and 374 from the UK) were collected from a cross-national survey. The results showed that in both China and the UK, performance expectations, social influence, and resistance bias had a strong effect on designers’ intentions to use GenAI tools. Trust was important in the UK but not in China, while access to technology and related resources was a stronger moderating factor in China. These findings highlight the role of technological contexts in shaping how professionals adopt GenAI in design work. By providing insights into these differences, this study contributes to the understanding of how GenAI can be adopted more effectively by design professionals in different regions and how these differences may influence the future global competitive landscape of GenAI in design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06796-x
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of generative AI adoption among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom: a UTAUT perspective

Paul Vinod Khiatani, Cong Fang, Wei Liu, Mingyuan Zhang et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A comparative analysis of generative AI adoption among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom: a UTAUT perspective

Paul Vinod Khiatani, Cong Fang, Wei Liu, Mingyuan Zhang, Huan Lin, Stephen Jia Wang
article en

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly transforming the design industry, offering new capabilities to enhance creativity and streamline design processes. However, there is still limited understanding of how design professionals in different countries and technological environments view and use these tools, especially given the uneven global development of GenAI. Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework (UTAUT), this study aims to investigate the factors that influence the adoption of GenAI tools among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom (UK). Overall, 607 responses (233 from China and 374 from the UK) were collected from a cross-national survey. The results showed that in both China and the UK, performance expectations, social influence, and resistance bias had a strong effect on designers’ intentions to use GenAI tools. Trust was important in the UK but not in China, while access to technology and related resources was a stronger moderating factor in China. These findings highlight the role of technological contexts in shaping how professionals adopt GenAI in design work. By providing insights into these differences, this study contributes to the understanding of how GenAI can be adopted more effectively by design professionals in different regions and how these differences may influence the future global competitive landscape of GenAI in design.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), King's College London (GB), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN), Quzhou University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.