Challenges to Homeopathy in View of the Framing of Modern Medicine: Towards a Proper Understanding of ‘Homeo-patho-logy’

The scientific and public discourse on medicine has in the last century been framed in a way that the progress of high-tech medicine, with its methodological restriction on materialistic aspects of the physical body, may appear as a plain success story, from ancient ignorance to modern science-leaving no constructive idea or reason for being of homeopathy. On the other hand, there has always been a tradition of scholarly criticism of medicine, be it historiographic, natural scientific, social or economical. The shortcomings of most conventional forms of critique, however, rest on their embeddedness in the usual one-dimensional thinking: i.e. their unintentional complying with, rather than questioning, the frame of predominant narratives.A categorial reframing of medicine may be possible on the basis of three recently rediscovered traditions of thinking, termed <i>lógos-</i>, <i>hómoion- and iásthai</i>-thinking. Within such an enlarged reframing of the scientific and public discourse, not only medical, social, economic, political and cultural problems could be handled and possibly solved on a higher level of consciousness, but also homeopathy, properly understood as 'homeo-patho-logy', would benefit and attain a better, much more reasonable standing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Homeopathy
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2762-4038
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges to Homeopathy in View of the Framing of Modern Medicine: Towards a Proper Understanding of ‘Homeo-patho-logy’

J. Michael Schmidt
Homeopathy
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Challenges to Homeopathy in View of the Framing of Modern Medicine: Towards a Proper Understanding of ‘Homeo-patho-logy’

J. Michael Schmidt
article en

Abstract

The scientific and public discourse on medicine has in the last century been framed in a way that the progress of high-tech medicine, with its methodological restriction on materialistic aspects of the physical body, may appear as a plain success story, from ancient ignorance to modern science-leaving no constructive idea or reason for being of homeopathy. On the other hand, there has always been a tradition of scholarly criticism of medicine, be it historiographic, natural scientific, social or economical. The shortcomings of most conventional forms of critique, however, rest on their embeddedness in the usual one-dimensional thinking: i.e. their unintentional complying with, rather than questioning, the frame of predominant narratives.A categorial reframing of medicine may be possible on the basis of three recently rediscovered traditions of thinking, termed <i>lógos-</i>, <i>hómoion- and iásthai</i>-thinking. Within such an enlarged reframing of the scientific and public discourse, not only medical, social, economic, political and cultural problems could be handled and possibly solved on a higher level of consciousness, but also homeopathy, properly understood as 'homeo-patho-logy', would benefit and attain a better, much more reasonable standing.

Homeopathy
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.