Extending the Health Belief Model (HBM): Integrating Relational Dynamics into a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Risk Perception Framework for Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW)

Women who have sex with women (WSW) often misperceive their risks of contracting or transmitting sexually transmitted infections. Reasons for why they are not engaging in safer sexual practices are diverse and complex. Emotional connection and trust have been found to be influential on this decision-making process, yet they are not often considered in studies that use the health belief model (HBM). Therefore, five online focus groups (<i>N</i> = 20) were conducted to better understand this health issue from a relational perspective and two themes emerged from the data: relational negotiations of risk and experiential quests. The themes inform our proposed theoretical extension, relational dynamics, that considers the intersection of both personal beliefs and partner influence on health decision-m3aking. Relational dynamics is defined as the interpersonal influences rooted in trust and emotional connection with sexual partners, to explain why WSW decide to engage, or not engage, in safer sexual practices. We argue that health beliefs among WSW are not shaped solely by individual-level cognitions as traditionally proposed by the HBM, but co-constructed socially and experientially. Our findings contribute to the theoretical development of the HBM and highlight the necessity of educating WSW on how to navigate their relationships as it pertains to their sexual health. Sexual health resources and messaging catered to WSW need to consider the role of a partner's influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2636998
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending the Health Belief Model (HBM): Integrating Relational Dynamics into a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Risk Perception Framework for Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW)

Kelly E. Tenzek, Yi Yin Leong
Health Communication
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Extending the Health Belief Model (HBM): Integrating Relational Dynamics into a Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Risk Perception Framework for Women Who Have Sex with Women (WSW)

Kelly E. Tenzek, Yi Yin Leong
article en

Abstract

Women who have sex with women (WSW) often misperceive their risks of contracting or transmitting sexually transmitted infections. Reasons for why they are not engaging in safer sexual practices are diverse and complex. Emotional connection and trust have been found to be influential on this decision-making process, yet they are not often considered in studies that use the health belief model (HBM). Therefore, five online focus groups (<i>N</i> = 20) were conducted to better understand this health issue from a relational perspective and two themes emerged from the data: relational negotiations of risk and experiential quests. The themes inform our proposed theoretical extension, relational dynamics, that considers the intersection of both personal beliefs and partner influence on health decision-m3aking. Relational dynamics is defined as the interpersonal influences rooted in trust and emotional connection with sexual partners, to explain why WSW decide to engage, or not engage, in safer sexual practices. We argue that health beliefs among WSW are not shaped solely by individual-level cognitions as traditionally proposed by the HBM, but co-constructed socially and experientially. Our findings contribute to the theoretical development of the HBM and highlight the necessity of educating WSW on how to navigate their relationships as it pertains to their sexual health. Sexual health resources and messaging catered to WSW need to consider the role of a partner's influence.

Health Communication
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.