Class-aware temporal and contextual contrastive framework for semi-supervised automated fault detection and diagnosis in air handling units

Automated Fault Detection and Diagnosis (AFDD) for Air Handling Units (AHUs) has largely relied on supervised learning, which is difficult to deploy when labeled data are scarce and fault classes are imbalanced. Existing label-efficient AFDD studies often evaluate self-supervised schemes on simulated or laboratory datasets, frequently in tabular form, and therefore do not fully capture the temporal structure and noise characteristics of real operational logs. This study proposes Class-Aware Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (CA-TCC) for label-efficient AHU AFDD on real buildings. CA-TCC is a semi-supervised framework that first performs self-supervised temporal/contextual contrastive pretraining on unlabeled operational logs and then performs class-aware semi-supervised refinement using limited labels together with unlabeled data via confidence-filtered pseudo-labels; a lightweight classifier head is subsequently trained for fault classification. Experiments on six datasets—three synthetic AHU benchmarks and three real operational datasets from an auditorium, a hospital, and an office building—show that CA-TCC consistently outperforms alternative self-supervised backbones across label budgets. With only 5% labeled data, CA-TCC improves macro F1 score and accuracy by approximately 5–10 and 5–9 points, respectively, while remaining within about 1–1.5 points of strong fully supervised models Cross-building transfer experiments demonstrate reliable source-to-target generalization across all building pairs under consistent label budgets. Additional analyses evaluate backbone fine-tuning policies, sensitivity to CA-TCC-specific hyperparameters, per-class behavior under different label fractions, and ablations of temporal, contextual, and class-aware components. Comparisons with representative baselines and inference-speed measurements further characterize suitability for near real-time AFDD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy and Buildings
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117233
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fault Detection and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Class-aware temporal and contextual contrastive framework for semi-supervised automated fault detection and diagnosis in air handling units

Seunghyeon Wang
1 citations
Energy and Buildings
Fault Detection and Control Systems
25.04
article

Class-aware temporal and contextual contrastive framework for semi-supervised automated fault detection and diagnosis in air handling units

Seunghyeon Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Automated Fault Detection and Diagnosis (AFDD) for Air Handling Units (AHUs) has largely relied on supervised learning, which is difficult to deploy when labeled data are scarce and fault classes are imbalanced. Existing label-efficient AFDD studies often evaluate self-supervised schemes on simulated or laboratory datasets, frequently in tabular form, and therefore do not fully capture the temporal structure and noise characteristics of real operational logs. This study proposes Class-Aware Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (CA-TCC) for label-efficient AHU AFDD on real buildings. CA-TCC is a semi-supervised framework that first performs self-supervised temporal/contextual contrastive pretraining on unlabeled operational logs and then performs class-aware semi-supervised refinement using limited labels together with unlabeled data via confidence-filtered pseudo-labels; a lightweight classifier head is subsequently trained for fault classification. Experiments on six datasets—three synthetic AHU benchmarks and three real operational datasets from an auditorium, a hospital, and an office building—show that CA-TCC consistently outperforms alternative self-supervised backbones across label budgets. With only 5% labeled data, CA-TCC improves macro F1 score and accuracy by approximately 5–10 and 5–9 points, respectively, while remaining within about 1–1.5 points of strong fully supervised models Cross-building transfer experiments demonstrate reliable source-to-target generalization across all building pairs under consistent label budgets. Additional analyses evaluate backbone fine-tuning policies, sensitivity to CA-TCC-specific hyperparameters, per-class behavior under different label fractions, and ablations of temporal, contextual, and class-aware components. Comparisons with representative baselines and inference-speed measurements further characterize suitability for near real-time AFDD.

Energy and BuildingsVol. 358
University College London (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Fault Detection and Control Systems
25.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.