Connectors and Influencers

We study a setting in which personal acquisition of information is costly and maintaining personal contacts to share information socially is also costly. The theory predicts star networks, with small groups sustaining an active hub and large groups allowing in addition for an inactive hub equilibrium. Experiments with small (8 subjects) and large (50 subjects) groups show star-like networks throughout. In small groups, behaviour matches the active hub prediction. In large groups, hubs are inactive or engage in activity far in excess of the active hub equilibrium, depending on how much information subjects are given on their own and others’ earnings. Hub’s activity level shapes relative earnings of subjects and the overall performance of the group.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.89400.3
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connectors and Influencers

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Connectors and Influencers

article en

Abstract

We study a setting in which personal acquisition of information is costly and maintaining personal contacts to share information socially is also costly. The theory predicts star networks, with small groups sustaining an active hub and large groups allowing in addition for an inactive hub equilibrium. Experiments with small (8 subjects) and large (50 subjects) groups show star-like networks throughout. In small groups, behaviour matches the active hub prediction. In large groups, hubs are inactive or engage in activity far in excess of the active hub equilibrium, depending on how much information subjects are given on their own and others’ earnings. Hub’s activity level shapes relative earnings of subjects and the overall performance of the group.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Connectors and Influencers · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS