Impact of tissue staining and scanner variation on the performance of pathology foundation models: a study of sarcomas and their mimics

Histopathological analysis is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and prognostication of cancer. Recent advances in AI, driven by large-scale digitisation and pan-cancer foundation models, are opening new opportunities for clinical integration. However, it remains unclear how robust these foundation models are to real-world sources of variability, particularly in H&E staining and scanners produced by different manufacturers. In this study, we use soft tissue tumours, a rare and morphologically diverse tumour type, as a challenging test case to systematically investigate the colour-related robustness and generalisability of seven AI models. Controlled staining and scanning experiments were utilised to assess model performance across diverse real-world data sources. Foundation models, particularly UNI-v2, Virchow and TITAN, demonstrated encouraging robustness to staining and scanning variation, particularly when a small number of stain-varied slides were included in the training loop, highlighting their potential as adaptable and data-efficient tools for real-world digital pathology workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.70080
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of tissue staining and scanner variation on the performance of pathology foundation models: a study of sarcomas and their mimics

David F. Steiner, Paul W Cool, Fatine Oumlil, Jianan Chen et al.
The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
AI in cancer detection
article

Impact of tissue staining and scanner variation on the performance of pathology foundation models: a study of sarcomas and their mimics

David F. Steiner, Paul W Cool, Fatine Oumlil, Jianan Chen, Anna Tollitt, Binghao Chai, Adrienne M Flanagan, Tapabrata Chakraborti
article en

Abstract

Histopathological analysis is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and prognostication of cancer. Recent advances in AI, driven by large-scale digitisation and pan-cancer foundation models, are opening new opportunities for clinical integration. However, it remains unclear how robust these foundation models are to real-world sources of variability, particularly in H&E staining and scanners produced by different manufacturers. In this study, we use soft tissue tumours, a rare and morphologically diverse tumour type, as a challenging test case to systematically investigate the colour-related robustness and generalisability of seven AI models. Controlled staining and scanning experiments were utilised to assess model performance across diverse real-world data sources. Foundation models, particularly UNI-v2, Virchow and TITAN, demonstrated encouraging robustness to staining and scanning variation, particularly when a small number of stain-varied slides were included in the training loop, highlighting their potential as adaptable and data-efficient tools for real-world digital pathology workflows.

The Journal of Pathology Clinical ResearchVol. 12(2)
Google (United States) (US), Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (GB), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (GB), The Alan Turing Institute (GB), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), University College London (GB), Keele University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.