Impact of tissue staining and scanner variation on the performance of pathology foundation models: a study of sarcomas and their mimics
Histopathological analysis is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and prognostication of cancer. Recent advances in AI, driven by large-scale digitisation and pan-cancer foundation models, are opening new opportunities for clinical integration. However, it remains unclear how robust these foundation models are to real-world sources of variability, particularly in H&E staining and scanners produced by different manufacturers. In this study, we use soft tissue tumours, a rare and morphologically diverse tumour type, as a challenging test case to systematically investigate the colour-related robustness and generalisability of seven AI models. Controlled staining and scanning experiments were utilised to assess model performance across diverse real-world data sources. Foundation models, particularly UNI-v2, Virchow and TITAN, demonstrated encouraging robustness to staining and scanning variation, particularly when a small number of stain-varied slides were included in the training loop, highlighting their potential as adaptable and data-efficient tools for real-world digital pathology workflows.
Authors
- David F. Steiner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1297-0023)
- Paul W Cool
- Fatine Oumlil
- Jianan Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2320-1954)
- Anna Tollitt
- Binghao Chai
- Adrienne M Flanagan
- Tapabrata Chakraborti
Institutions
- Google (United States) (US)
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
- The Alan Turing Institute (GB)
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Keele University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
- Published
- 2026-02-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/2056-4538.70080
- Primary Topic
- AI in cancer detection
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00