What behavioral relevance is (not)
We are thankful for the thoughtful commentaries of our colleagues. In our discussion article, we argued for a course correction to how the field approaches the organization of visual function in occipitotemporal cortex (OTC) - one that moves us away from the dominant framework of category-selectivity towards a more ethological one centered on behavioral relevance. Some of the commentaries raised important issues regarding how our proposed framework does (or does not) contrast with category-selectivity. Other commentaries made helpful suggestions for how behavioral relevance can be studied. As a whole, the commentaries show that much work remains to be done, both theoretically and empirically, in developing a framework centered on behavioral relevance.
Authors
- Susan G. Wardle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-7461)
- Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-2501)
- Chris I. Baker
- J Brendan Ritchie
- Dwight J Kravitz
Institutions
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- University of Delaware (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Published
- 2026-02-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2026.2632644
- Primary Topic
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00