Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives in Managing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Survey of Unmet Needs and Perceived Benefits of Treating Systemic Inflammation in Cardiovascular Diseases

Few surveys have focused on a patient's journey or healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perspectives in treating inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Patients with ASCVD (n=200) and HCPs (n=204) completed separate 30-minute, online questionnaires between 6/24 and 8/24. HCPs included cardiologists (83%) and cardiology NPs or PAs (17%). Patients that completed the survey, however, were not linked to the HCP's that participated. Among patients with ASCVD, HCPs reported initiation rates of statin and antiplatelet therapy at 78% and 65%, respectively. Only a limited number of patients (18%) believed their treatment was working extremely well, with 82% reporting persistent symptoms, including chest pain (28%), issues walking (28%), or issues breathing and/or cough (26%). Most HCPs (87%) believed that residual cardiovascular risk remained after modifying traditional ASCVD risk factors. Two-thirds (66%) of HCPs agreed that inflammation is an important component in ASCVD, not sufficiently addressed by current treatments and only 58% reported being mostly to extremely satisfied with current ASCVD treatments. Approximately 29% of cardiologists reported that they measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) often or always, and of those, 79% did so due to the presence or suspicion of an inflammatory comorbidity. Uncertainty exists about the evaluation and treatment of inflammation in patients with ASCVD. Ongoing studies evaluating anti-inflammatory therapies will help to inform future hsCRP testing in the ASCVD population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/fjc.0000000000001800
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives in Managing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Survey of Unmet Needs and Perceived Benefits of Treating Systemic Inflammation in Cardiovascular Diseases

Carey Robar, B. Weber, Kerry Byrne, Udi Fainberg et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Patients’ and Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives in Managing Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Survey of Unmet Needs and Perceived Benefits of Treating Systemic Inflammation in Cardiovascular Diseases

Carey Robar, B. Weber, Kerry Byrne, Udi Fainberg, Delilah McCarty, M F Marat Fudim
article en

Abstract

Few surveys have focused on a patient's journey or healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perspectives in treating inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Patients with ASCVD (n=200) and HCPs (n=204) completed separate 30-minute, online questionnaires between 6/24 and 8/24. HCPs included cardiologists (83%) and cardiology NPs or PAs (17%). Patients that completed the survey, however, were not linked to the HCP's that participated. Among patients with ASCVD, HCPs reported initiation rates of statin and antiplatelet therapy at 78% and 65%, respectively. Only a limited number of patients (18%) believed their treatment was working extremely well, with 82% reporting persistent symptoms, including chest pain (28%), issues walking (28%), or issues breathing and/or cough (26%). Most HCPs (87%) believed that residual cardiovascular risk remained after modifying traditional ASCVD risk factors. Two-thirds (66%) of HCPs agreed that inflammation is an important component in ASCVD, not sufficiently addressed by current treatments and only 58% reported being mostly to extremely satisfied with current ASCVD treatments. Approximately 29% of cardiologists reported that they measured high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) often or always, and of those, 79% did so due to the presence or suspicion of an inflammatory comorbidity. Uncertainty exists about the evaluation and treatment of inflammation in patients with ASCVD. Ongoing studies evaluating anti-inflammatory therapies will help to inform future hsCRP testing in the ASCVD population.

Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Providence College (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Novo Nordisk (United States) (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke University Health System (US), Hope Heart Institute (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.