Carbon emissions trading system and corporate financial decisions: evidence from China

Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach on a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms, we find that the carbon emissions trading system (ETS) increases financial distress risk for emission-regulated firms, prompting them to adopt more conservative financial strategies. To mitigate the risks of carbon reduction policies, these firms reduce total investment, increase cash holdings, and reallocate resources toward low-carbon technologies to facilitate the low-carbon transition. Our analysis of heterogeneity in market competition reveals that the inhibitory effect of the carbon emissions trading system on corporate investment is stronger in less competitive markets. This study shows that climate policy risk really does play a role in how companies make financial decisions. It also provides insights for policymakers on designing cost-bearing mechanisms within climate mitigation policies to ensure the effective implementation of the “polluter pays” principle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Management
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2026.2618351
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon emissions trading system and corporate financial decisions: evidence from China

Yuxuan Wang, Chan Lyu
Carbon Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Carbon emissions trading system and corporate financial decisions: evidence from China

Yuxuan Wang, Chan Lyu
article en

Abstract

Using a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) approach on a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms, we find that the carbon emissions trading system (ETS) increases financial distress risk for emission-regulated firms, prompting them to adopt more conservative financial strategies. To mitigate the risks of carbon reduction policies, these firms reduce total investment, increase cash holdings, and reallocate resources toward low-carbon technologies to facilitate the low-carbon transition. Our analysis of heterogeneity in market competition reveals that the inhibitory effect of the carbon emissions trading system on corporate investment is stronger in less competitive markets. This study shows that climate policy risk really does play a role in how companies make financial decisions. It also provides insights for policymakers on designing cost-bearing mechanisms within climate mitigation policies to ensure the effective implementation of the “polluter pays” principle.

Carbon ManagementVol. 17(1)
Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.