Gender-Specificity of Sexual Attraction Across Cultures: Individual and Societal Factors

Previous studies have reported that men's sexual attraction is more gender-specific than women's, with stronger attraction to their preferred gender and weaker attraction to their non-preferred gender. The current study examined the universality of these gender differences and their relations to the social construction of gender and sexuality. Using data from the Gender Mosaic Cross-Cultural Dataset (<i>N</i> > 35,000 participants across 25 countries), we replicated the gender differences in sexual attraction to the preferred and non-preferred gender and in gender-specificity of sexual attraction. However, the magnitude of these differences varied across countries. As predicted, gender typicality (i.e., self-rated femininity for women and masculinity for men) was positively associated with attraction to the preferred gender among all participants and negatively associated with same-sex attraction among straight individuals, with a stronger association in men. At the country level, more negative attitudes toward homosexuality were linked with lower same-sex attraction in straight individuals. Exploratory analyses revealed that the cross-cultural variability in the magnitude of these gender differences was related to nation-level sexual drive and sexual pleasure in partnered sex. These findings suggest that socio-cultural factors are central to gender differences in self-reported sexual attraction, partly reflecting the social construction of gender and sexuality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2026.2630959
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-Specificity of Sexual Attraction Across Cultures: Individual and Societal Factors

Veronica Kostenko, J Daphna, Sapir Keinan-Bar
The Journal of Sex Research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Gender-Specificity of Sexual Attraction Across Cultures: Individual and Societal Factors

Veronica Kostenko, J Daphna, Sapir Keinan-Bar
article en

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that men's sexual attraction is more gender-specific than women's, with stronger attraction to their preferred gender and weaker attraction to their non-preferred gender. The current study examined the universality of these gender differences and their relations to the social construction of gender and sexuality. Using data from the Gender Mosaic Cross-Cultural Dataset (<i>N</i> > 35,000 participants across 25 countries), we replicated the gender differences in sexual attraction to the preferred and non-preferred gender and in gender-specificity of sexual attraction. However, the magnitude of these differences varied across countries. As predicted, gender typicality (i.e., self-rated femininity for women and masculinity for men) was positively associated with attraction to the preferred gender among all participants and negatively associated with same-sex attraction among straight individuals, with a stronger association in men. At the country level, more negative attitudes toward homosexuality were linked with lower same-sex attraction in straight individuals. Exploratory analyses revealed that the cross-cultural variability in the magnitude of these gender differences was related to nation-level sexual drive and sexual pleasure in partnered sex. These findings suggest that socio-cultural factors are central to gender differences in self-reported sexual attraction, partly reflecting the social construction of gender and sexuality.

The Journal of Sex Research
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.