Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption

Background Timely identification of lactose intolerance is crucial to prevent secondary complications. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three commonly used methods for detecting lactose malabsorption (LM): the lactose hydrogen breath test (LHBT), the lactose tolerance test (LTT), and the genetic test (GT). Methods Patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome underwent fasting and post-lactose (20 g) evaluations, including measurements of breath hydrogen, blood glucose, and genotyping for the C/T-13910 polymorphism associated with lactase persistence in European populations. A sustained increase of breath hydrogen ≥20 ppm above baseline, a failure of plasma glucose to rise >20 mg/dL from fasting levels, and the presence of the C/T-13910 variant were defined as positive for LHBT, LTT, and GT, respectively. Results One hundred and eight patients (age 39 ± 14 years, 17 males) were enrolled. Eighty-eight had symptoms after lactose ingestion. Of these, 88 (100%) were LHBT and 69 (78%) were LTT positive. Of a subgroup of 33 patients undergoing GT, 27 presented symptoms and 25 tested positive. Sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 85% for LHBT, 78% and 48% for LTT, and 93% and 83% for GT. Conclusions: With observation times greater than 4 h, LHBT had higher sensitivity and specificity than LTT and GT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1973798x261422970
Primary Topic
Digestive system and related health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption

F. Gori, Laura Tomaino, Alessandra Piontini, Raffaella Memmola et al.
Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Digestive system and related health
article

Lactose intolerance: Comparative assessment of diagnostic methods for lactose malabsorption

F. Gori, Laura Tomaino, Alessandra Piontini, Raffaella Memmola, Carlo La Vecchia, Silvia Budelli, Luisella Vigna, Paolo Marraccini
article en

Abstract

Background Timely identification of lactose intolerance is crucial to prevent secondary complications. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three commonly used methods for detecting lactose malabsorption (LM): the lactose hydrogen breath test (LHBT), the lactose tolerance test (LTT), and the genetic test (GT). Methods Patients diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome underwent fasting and post-lactose (20 g) evaluations, including measurements of breath hydrogen, blood glucose, and genotyping for the C/T-13910 polymorphism associated with lactase persistence in European populations. A sustained increase of breath hydrogen ≥20 ppm above baseline, a failure of plasma glucose to rise >20 mg/dL from fasting levels, and the presence of the C/T-13910 variant were defined as positive for LHBT, LTT, and GT, respectively. Results One hundred and eight patients (age 39 ± 14 years, 17 males) were enrolled. Eighty-eight had symptoms after lactose ingestion. Of these, 88 (100%) were LHBT and 69 (78%) were LTT positive. Of a subgroup of 33 patients undergoing GT, 27 presented symptoms and 25 tested positive. Sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 85% for LHBT, 78% and 48% for LTT, and 93% and 83% for GT. Conclusions: With observation times greater than 4 h, LHBT had higher sensitivity and specificity than LTT and GT.

Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Milan (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Digestive system and related health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.