Evaluation of a collaborative care system in primary care in the implementation of ambulatory follow-up in mental health: A study protocol

Access to secondary psychiatric consultation is often challenging for general practitioners (GPs), potentially resulting in treatment delays or increased reliance on emergency services. The med@psy system is a collaborative care platform that enables GPs to schedule consultation appointments with psychiatrists within 48 hours. This study aims to compare the implementation of outpatient follow-up between two care pathways: attendance at a psychiatric emergency department for a consultation followed by discharge home and psychiatric consultation referred by the patient's GP via the med@psy collaborative care system. The study consists of two prospective, multicenter, comparative and nonrandomized cohorts. Patients will be teleconsulted at one month and again at three months to assess whether they have received appropriate outpatient follow-up. This is a real-life study involving GPs and psychiatrists within a collaborative care model. The strengths and limitations of this study are discussed below. The results of this study will help gather valuable data on these two care pathways and will serve as a basis for improving and optimizing patient management strategies in outpatient mental health care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06581874.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343295
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a collaborative care system in primary care in the implementation of ambulatory follow-up in mental health: A study protocol

Asmaa JOBIC, Raoul Belzeaux-R, Natacha Rosso, A Autret et al.
PLoS ONE
Healthcare Systems and Technology
article

Evaluation of a collaborative care system in primary care in the implementation of ambulatory follow-up in mental health: A study protocol

Asmaa JOBIC, Raoul Belzeaux-R, Natacha Rosso, A Autret, Fabien Korrichi, Jean Vion-Dury, Manon Abello, Manuel Dias Alves
article en

Abstract

Access to secondary psychiatric consultation is often challenging for general practitioners (GPs), potentially resulting in treatment delays or increased reliance on emergency services. The med@psy system is a collaborative care platform that enables GPs to schedule consultation appointments with psychiatrists within 48 hours. This study aims to compare the implementation of outpatient follow-up between two care pathways: attendance at a psychiatric emergency department for a consultation followed by discharge home and psychiatric consultation referred by the patient's GP via the med@psy collaborative care system. The study consists of two prospective, multicenter, comparative and nonrandomized cohorts. Patients will be teleconsulted at one month and again at three months to assess whether they have received appropriate outpatient follow-up. This is a real-life study involving GPs and psychiatrists within a collaborative care model. The strengths and limitations of this study are discussed below. The results of this study will help gather valuable data on these two care pathways and will serve as a basis for improving and optimizing patient management strategies in outpatient mental health care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06581874.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ceres (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon-La Seyne-sur-Mer (FR), Sommeil, Addiction et Neuropsychiatrie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Healthcare Systems and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.