THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION IN RESOLVING SPORTS DISPUTES: LESSONS FROM CAS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NIGERIA

The resolution of disputes in sports has become increasingly significant as the sector evolves into a multi-billion-dollar global industry.Traditional litigation often proves inadequate for resolving sports conflicts due to its delays, jurisdictional limits, and lack of specialized expertise.Arbitration has therefore emerged as the preferred method, offering neutrality, confidentiality, and speed.At the centre of this global framework is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), established in 1984, which has built a strong jurisprudence on matters ranging from doping, eligibility, and player transfers, to sponsorship and disciplinary issues.CAS has become a cornerstone of international sports governance, ensuring uniformity and predictability in sports dispute resolution.In Nigeria, sports dispute resolution remains underdeveloped despite provisions in the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) Statutes.Articles 68 and 69 of the Statutes prohibit recourse to ordinary courts for football-related matters, directing disputes instead to the NFF Arbitration Tribunal or, in international cases, to CAS.However, in practice, Nigerian sports disputes are frequently taken to civil courts, undermining both the statutory framework and FIFA's global dispute resolution standards.The NFF Arbitration Tribunal itself suffers from institutional weaknesses, including questions about independence, credibility, and enforceability of awards.This paper critically analyses the role of arbitration in resolving sports disputes, with lessons drawn from CAS, and evaluates their implications for Nigeria.It argues that while Nigeria's recognition of arbitration in its statutes is commendable, effective implementation requires reform.By institutionalizing credible arbitral structures, embracing independence and impartiality, and adopting CAS principles, Nigeria can enhance athlete welfare, reduce delays, and strengthen its sports governance in line with international best practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UDUS Law Journal
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61955/dsjsue
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION IN RESOLVING SPORTS DISPUTES: LESSONS FROM CAS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NIGERIA

MOHAMMED MOHAMMED
UDUS Law Journal
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION IN RESOLVING SPORTS DISPUTES: LESSONS FROM CAS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NIGERIA

MOHAMMED MOHAMMED
article en

Abstract

The resolution of disputes in sports has become increasingly significant as the sector evolves into a multi-billion-dollar global industry.Traditional litigation often proves inadequate for resolving sports conflicts due to its delays, jurisdictional limits, and lack of specialized expertise.Arbitration has therefore emerged as the preferred method, offering neutrality, confidentiality, and speed.At the centre of this global framework is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), established in 1984, which has built a strong jurisprudence on matters ranging from doping, eligibility, and player transfers, to sponsorship and disciplinary issues.CAS has become a cornerstone of international sports governance, ensuring uniformity and predictability in sports dispute resolution.In Nigeria, sports dispute resolution remains underdeveloped despite provisions in the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) Statutes.Articles 68 and 69 of the Statutes prohibit recourse to ordinary courts for football-related matters, directing disputes instead to the NFF Arbitration Tribunal or, in international cases, to CAS.However, in practice, Nigerian sports disputes are frequently taken to civil courts, undermining both the statutory framework and FIFA's global dispute resolution standards.The NFF Arbitration Tribunal itself suffers from institutional weaknesses, including questions about independence, credibility, and enforceability of awards.This paper critically analyses the role of arbitration in resolving sports disputes, with lessons drawn from CAS, and evaluates their implications for Nigeria.It argues that while Nigeria's recognition of arbitration in its statutes is commendable, effective implementation requires reform.By institutionalizing credible arbitral structures, embracing independence and impartiality, and adopting CAS principles, Nigeria can enhance athlete welfare, reduce delays, and strengthen its sports governance in line with international best practices.

UDUS Law Journal
Usmanu Danfodiyo University (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.