Neural Mechanisms of Social Homeostasis: Dynamic Range Plasticity

To address the open question of how animals respond to dynamic changes in their social environment, we propose a framework in which cumulative effects of previous experience inform a key mechanism to regulate the bounds within which social experiences can vary without activating costly, corrective mechanisms. We define this as the dynamic range. By leveraging insights from human studies and animal models, future research will contribute to our understanding of the intricate neural underpinnings that mediate social behavior. Key questions facing the field of social neuroscience include the following: How do experienced statistics of the environment calibrate neural circuits that regulate social behavior? What neural mechanisms allow some individuals to better adapt to dynamic environments than others? How does social homeostasis interact with other homeostatic systems, such as the stress response? This framework provides a testable model for investigating the neural mechanisms through which history calibrates the dynamic range within detector, control center, and effector systems of social homeostasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0224-25.2025
Primary Topic
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Mechanisms of Social Homeostasis: Dynamic Range Plasticity

Jonathan D. Salk, Caroline Jia, Kay M. Tye, Jianna Cressy
Journal of Neuroscience
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
article

Neural Mechanisms of Social Homeostasis: Dynamic Range Plasticity

Jonathan D. Salk, Caroline Jia, Kay M. Tye, Jianna Cressy
article en

Abstract

To address the open question of how animals respond to dynamic changes in their social environment, we propose a framework in which cumulative effects of previous experience inform a key mechanism to regulate the bounds within which social experiences can vary without activating costly, corrective mechanisms. We define this as the dynamic range. By leveraging insights from human studies and animal models, future research will contribute to our understanding of the intricate neural underpinnings that mediate social behavior. Key questions facing the field of social neuroscience include the following: How do experienced statistics of the environment calibrate neural circuits that regulate social behavior? What neural mechanisms allow some individuals to better adapt to dynamic environments than others? How does social homeostasis interact with other homeostatic systems, such as the stress response? This framework provides a testable model for investigating the neural mechanisms through which history calibrates the dynamic range within detector, control center, and effector systems of social homeostasis.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 46(8)
Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US), Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of California System (US), University of California San Diego (US), MIND Research Institute (US), University of California San Diego Medical Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.