How to trace ancient root systems and fossil rhizospheres? A method comparison between base hydrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation

• We compared base hydrolysis and pyrolysis to trace fossil root-derived OM. • Both approaches revealed the presence of suberin monomers in calcified roots. • Pyrolysis failed to detect suberin monomers in rhizosphere and root-free sediments. • In OM-poor and fossil systems, only base hydrolysis enables tracing of root remains. Hydrolyzable lipids including suberin-derived monomers have been used to identify and quantify input of root-derived organic matter (OM) in soils. The two most common analytical methods are base hydrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation (THM), each followed by gas chromatography and detection via mass spectrometry. We compared both approaches in ancient root systems to test their suitability for tracing root remains in subsoils and geological settings. We sampled a fossil rhizolith (calcified root from unknown source vegetation) from a Central European loess-paleosol sequence together with rhizosphere loess, as well as root-free loess. After removal of free lipids, hydrolyzable lipids were released in one sample aliquot via base hydrolysis, and in another sample aliquot similar lipids were investigated via online THM. For verification, also a younger (sub-recent) rhizolith and respective rhizosphere, attributed to the recent oak vegetation, were sampled in a Southeast European soil profile developed on fluvial sand. Both methods were able to reveal the presence of suberin monomers in rhizoliths, however in case of the fossil sample set THM failed to detect suberin monomers in rhizosphere and root-free materials. Based on base hydrolysis results, we could trace root-derived OM in rhizospheres both of the sub-recent and the fossil root. In both sample sets, ω-hydroxy carboxylic acids were found in root and rhizosphere but were absent or occurred only in very low amounts in root-free sediments, and a trend of decreasing chain length of ω-hydroxy carboxylic acids from root towards root-free sediment was observed. We conclude that THM is a suitable method to rapidly detect and quantify root input in case of living and recently deceased roots and has the advantage that also lignin-derived monomers are detected. However, in OM-poor and fossil samples, only base hydrolysis provides useful insights into bound lipids and specifically root-derived OM composition for potential source apportionment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organic Geochemistry
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2026.105175
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to trace ancient root systems and fossil rhizospheres? A method comparison between base hydrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation

Marie‐France Dignac, Christelle Anquetil, Sylvie Derenne, Guido L.B. Wiesenberg et al.
Organic Geochemistry
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
article

How to trace ancient root systems and fossil rhizospheres? A method comparison between base hydrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation

Marie‐France Dignac, Christelle Anquetil, Sylvie Derenne, Guido L.B. Wiesenberg, Martina I. Gocke, Cornelia Rumpel, Arnaud Huguet
article en

Abstract

• We compared base hydrolysis and pyrolysis to trace fossil root-derived OM. • Both approaches revealed the presence of suberin monomers in calcified roots. • Pyrolysis failed to detect suberin monomers in rhizosphere and root-free sediments. • In OM-poor and fossil systems, only base hydrolysis enables tracing of root remains. Hydrolyzable lipids including suberin-derived monomers have been used to identify and quantify input of root-derived organic matter (OM) in soils. The two most common analytical methods are base hydrolysis and thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation (THM), each followed by gas chromatography and detection via mass spectrometry. We compared both approaches in ancient root systems to test their suitability for tracing root remains in subsoils and geological settings. We sampled a fossil rhizolith (calcified root from unknown source vegetation) from a Central European loess-paleosol sequence together with rhizosphere loess, as well as root-free loess. After removal of free lipids, hydrolyzable lipids were released in one sample aliquot via base hydrolysis, and in another sample aliquot similar lipids were investigated via online THM. For verification, also a younger (sub-recent) rhizolith and respective rhizosphere, attributed to the recent oak vegetation, were sampled in a Southeast European soil profile developed on fluvial sand. Both methods were able to reveal the presence of suberin monomers in rhizoliths, however in case of the fossil sample set THM failed to detect suberin monomers in rhizosphere and root-free materials. Based on base hydrolysis results, we could trace root-derived OM in rhizospheres both of the sub-recent and the fossil root. In both sample sets, ω-hydroxy carboxylic acids were found in root and rhizosphere but were absent or occurred only in very low amounts in root-free sediments, and a trend of decreasing chain length of ω-hydroxy carboxylic acids from root towards root-free sediment was observed. We conclude that THM is a suitable method to rapidly detect and quantify root input in case of living and recently deceased roots and has the advantage that also lignin-derived monomers are detected. However, in OM-poor and fossil samples, only base hydrolysis provides useful insights into bound lipids and specifically root-derived OM composition for potential source apportionment.

Organic GeochemistryVol. 215
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), University of Zurich (CH), Sorbonne Université (FR), Milieux environnementaux, transferts et interactions dans les hydrosystèmes et les sols (FR), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.