Strengths, limitations, and way forward of home-based rehabilitation practices after stroke: a scoping review

Home-based motor rehabilitation after stroke has a great potential to promote task-specific and context-specific training in a familiar, functionally rich context, supporting more personalised, engaging, and adaptable rehabilitation experiences. This review aims to map existing practices in home-based motor rehabilitation after stroke and critically examine whether this potential is fully utilized and identify strengths and limitations. It further explores how healthcare professionals can optimise their planning and delivery of interventions. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 5 databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility and extracted characteristics of each study into a data charting table. Sixty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The results highlighted a consistent implementation of task-specific exercises but limited implementation of context-specific stimuli, inadequate training dosage, and limited contextual adaptation to the home environment. Further, instructional methods tended to be overly prescriptive, co-design strategies applied inconsistently, and caregiver engagement often underutilised. Existing practices do not fully utilize the potential of home-based rehabilitation. We argue clinical work should prioritise early-phase interventions with adequate intensity and develop pedagogical frameworks to guide home modifications and instructional methods. The framework should support progressive and engaging practice, and fully adopt co-designed, person-centred approaches that meaningfully involve family caregivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14139-4
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengths, limitations, and way forward of home-based rehabilitation practices after stroke: a scoping review

Guna Berzina, Lena Rafsten, Arve Opheim, Matheus M. Pacheco et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Strengths, limitations, and way forward of home-based rehabilitation practices after stroke: a scoping review

Guna Berzina, Lena Rafsten, Arve Opheim, Matheus M. Pacheco, Luca Oppici, Ann Marie Hestetun-Mandrup, James R. Rudd, Katharina S. Sunnerhagen, Emilie Halmrast Simonsen, Marianne Løvstad
article en

Abstract

Home-based motor rehabilitation after stroke has a great potential to promote task-specific and context-specific training in a familiar, functionally rich context, supporting more personalised, engaging, and adaptable rehabilitation experiences. This review aims to map existing practices in home-based motor rehabilitation after stroke and critically examine whether this potential is fully utilized and identify strengths and limitations. It further explores how healthcare professionals can optimise their planning and delivery of interventions. A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 5 databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility and extracted characteristics of each study into a data charting table. Sixty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. The results highlighted a consistent implementation of task-specific exercises but limited implementation of context-specific stimuli, inadequate training dosage, and limited contextual adaptation to the home environment. Further, instructional methods tended to be overly prescriptive, co-design strategies applied inconsistently, and caregiver engagement often underutilised. Existing practices do not fully utilize the potential of home-based rehabilitation. We argue clinical work should prioritise early-phase interventions with adequate intensity and develop pedagogical frameworks to guide home modifications and instructional methods. The framework should support progressive and engaging practice, and fully adopt co-designed, person-centred approaches that meaningfully involve family caregivers.

BMC Health Services Research
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade do Porto (PT), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), University of Oslo (NO), Sunnaas sykehus (NO), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Monash University Prato Centre (IT), Vestlandsforsking (NO), Riga East University Hospital (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.