Two decades of prenatal diagnosis in hemophilia A and B: a systematic review of global trends and current practices

Hemophilia A and B are severe X-linked bleeding disorders caused by variants in the F8 and F9 genes, respectively. Over the past two decades, prenatal diagnosis (PND) has become an essential component of hemophilia management, yet global practices remain heterogeneous. This study aimed to analyze worldwide trends, methodologies, and outcomes of PND for hemophilia A and B, highlighting advances, disparities, and future needs. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant publications between January 2005 and September 2025. Twenty-four eligible studies encompassing 969 pregnancies were included. Among them, 78.3% (n = 759) were hemophilia A carriers and 16.3% (n = 158) hemophilia B carriers. Amniocentesis (45.8%) and chorionic villus sampling (41.6%) were the most frequently applied techniques, while non-invasive cell-free DNA testing was reported in 20.8% of studies as an emerging alternative. Direct sequencing and PCR-based assays were each used in 45.8% of cases, followed by linkage analysis in 33.3%. Out of 423 fetuses analyzed, 318 (~ 75%) were affected, including 245 (~ 58%) with hemophilia A, 47 (~ 11%) with hemophilia B, and for 26 (6%) the specific type of hemophilia was not reported. Pregnancy outcomes were reported in 10 studies: 45 (14%) affected pregnancies were terminated, 15 (4.7%) were continued to term, and data were unavailable for 81% of cases. Most publications originated from China (n = 8; 33.3%), Italy (n = 5; 20.8%), and India (n = 3; 12.5%), underscoring global disparities in access and reporting. Over time, a clear transition from linkage analysis to molecular sequencing was observed, alongside the early adoption of next-generation and digital PCR techniques. This study reveals remarkable progress in molecular diagnostics that has substantially improved PND accuracy for hemophilia. However, regional inequities, limited reporting of pregnancy outcomes, and restricted access to advanced technologies persist. Establishing harmonized international guidelines, expanding non-invasive testing validation, and promoting equitable access to genetic services are crucial steps to ensure that future PND practices support informed reproductive decisions and global health equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thrombosis Journal
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-026-00847-8
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two decades of prenatal diagnosis in hemophilia A and B: a systematic review of global trends and current practices

Majid Safa, Seyed Mehrab Safdari, Akram Sadat Jaafarian, Fatemeh Damerchiloo et al.
Thrombosis Journal
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Two decades of prenatal diagnosis in hemophilia A and B: a systematic review of global trends and current practices

Majid Safa, Seyed Mehrab Safdari, Akram Sadat Jaafarian, Fatemeh Damerchiloo, Mehdi Bakhtiyaridovvombaigi, Fateme Amiri Samani
article en

Abstract

Hemophilia A and B are severe X-linked bleeding disorders caused by variants in the F8 and F9 genes, respectively. Over the past two decades, prenatal diagnosis (PND) has become an essential component of hemophilia management, yet global practices remain heterogeneous. This study aimed to analyze worldwide trends, methodologies, and outcomes of PND for hemophilia A and B, highlighting advances, disparities, and future needs. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant publications between January 2005 and September 2025. Twenty-four eligible studies encompassing 969 pregnancies were included. Among them, 78.3% (n = 759) were hemophilia A carriers and 16.3% (n = 158) hemophilia B carriers. Amniocentesis (45.8%) and chorionic villus sampling (41.6%) were the most frequently applied techniques, while non-invasive cell-free DNA testing was reported in 20.8% of studies as an emerging alternative. Direct sequencing and PCR-based assays were each used in 45.8% of cases, followed by linkage analysis in 33.3%. Out of 423 fetuses analyzed, 318 (~ 75%) were affected, including 245 (~ 58%) with hemophilia A, 47 (~ 11%) with hemophilia B, and for 26 (6%) the specific type of hemophilia was not reported. Pregnancy outcomes were reported in 10 studies: 45 (14%) affected pregnancies were terminated, 15 (4.7%) were continued to term, and data were unavailable for 81% of cases. Most publications originated from China (n = 8; 33.3%), Italy (n = 5; 20.8%), and India (n = 3; 12.5%), underscoring global disparities in access and reporting. Over time, a clear transition from linkage analysis to molecular sequencing was observed, alongside the early adoption of next-generation and digital PCR techniques. This study reveals remarkable progress in molecular diagnostics that has substantially improved PND accuracy for hemophilia. However, regional inequities, limited reporting of pregnancy outcomes, and restricted access to advanced technologies persist. Establishing harmonized international guidelines, expanding non-invasive testing validation, and promoting equitable access to genetic services are crucial steps to ensure that future PND practices support informed reproductive decisions and global health equity.

Thrombosis JournalVol. 24(1)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Hemophilia Center of Iran (IR), High Institute for Education and Research in Transfusion Medicine (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.