Modern hydraulic-based FSDS layouts: impact of vine growth stage and canopy density on spray performance

Fixed spray delivery system (FSDS), an alternative to conventional pesticide technologies, is gaining interest in grapevine. Indeed, especially in steep-sloped vineyards, optimal configured FSDS layout can enhance operator safety and potentially provide adequate spray performance. This study compared the spray performance of two modern 2-tier hydraulic-based FSDS layouts (L1 and L2), tailored to a vertical shoot positioning-trained vineyard. The investigation was conducted across three vine growth stages, with two canopy densities evaluated at each stage. Spray performance was assessed in terms of canopy deposits, in-field ground losses, and the impact of the plant protection product (PPP) wash-off effect caused by water used as propellant. Results were compared with field data obtained under comparable conditions using a conventional airblast sprayer. With respect to L1 layout, L2 layout achieved across the growth stages 1.75 and 1.55 times more canopy deposit and ground losses, respectively. Moreover, the L2 layout resulted in a more uniform canop y deposit within the sampled area resulting in a more promising HSD-FSDS configuration for grapevine spray applications. The PPP wash-off effect evaluation further supported this outcome but also identified areas for refinement to enhance spray performance. Based also on the comparison with the conventional airblast sprayer, recommendations for future protection plans are proposed, providing a step-forward toward large-scale adoption and implementation of HSD-FSDS technology. • Hydraulic-based fixed spray delivery system (HSD-FSDS) was evaluated in a vertical shoot positioning trained vineyard. • Two HSD-FSDS layouts were tested across three growth stages and two canopy densities. • Spray deposit in the canopy, in-field ground losses, and wash-off effects were assessed. • Layout configuration influenced spray uniformity and spray performance. • Design modifications and tailored agricultural practices may help optimize HSD-FSDS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Protection
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2026.107584
Primary Topic
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern hydraulic-based FSDS layouts: impact of vine growth stage and canopy density on spray performance

F. Gioelli, Marco Grella, Eric Mozzanini, Marco Resecco et al.
Crop Protection
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
article

Modern hydraulic-based FSDS layouts: impact of vine growth stage and canopy density on spray performance

F. Gioelli, Marco Grella, Eric Mozzanini, Marco Resecco, Corinna Astengo, Paolo Marucco
article en

Abstract

Fixed spray delivery system (FSDS), an alternative to conventional pesticide technologies, is gaining interest in grapevine. Indeed, especially in steep-sloped vineyards, optimal configured FSDS layout can enhance operator safety and potentially provide adequate spray performance. This study compared the spray performance of two modern 2-tier hydraulic-based FSDS layouts (L1 and L2), tailored to a vertical shoot positioning-trained vineyard. The investigation was conducted across three vine growth stages, with two canopy densities evaluated at each stage. Spray performance was assessed in terms of canopy deposits, in-field ground losses, and the impact of the plant protection product (PPP) wash-off effect caused by water used as propellant. Results were compared with field data obtained under comparable conditions using a conventional airblast sprayer. With respect to L1 layout, L2 layout achieved across the growth stages 1.75 and 1.55 times more canopy deposit and ground losses, respectively. Moreover, the L2 layout resulted in a more uniform canop y deposit within the sampled area resulting in a more promising HSD-FSDS configuration for grapevine spray applications. The PPP wash-off effect evaluation further supported this outcome but also identified areas for refinement to enhance spray performance. Based also on the comparison with the conventional airblast sprayer, recommendations for future protection plans are proposed, providing a step-forward toward large-scale adoption and implementation of HSD-FSDS technology. • Hydraulic-based fixed spray delivery system (HSD-FSDS) was evaluated in a vertical shoot positioning trained vineyard. • Two HSD-FSDS layouts were tested across three growth stages and two canopy densities. • Spray deposit in the canopy, in-field ground losses, and wash-off effects were assessed. • Layout configuration influenced spray uniformity and spray performance. • Design modifications and tailored agricultural practices may help optimize HSD-FSDS.

Crop ProtectionVol. 204
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.